decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
unlikely | 438 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Schwartz's revenge
Authored by: PJ on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 02:25 PM EDT
Not at all. He was chatting amiably with
Ms. Katz before the session started.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

unlikely
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 04:21 PM EDT
I would rather assume that he is just telling the truth, under oath, as everyone
is obliged to do.

It's Oracle's fault that they got themselves into this situation, where they are
trying to win a copyright case based on a highly distorted (lets say,
"fanciful") narrative about the past. Schwartz happens to have been
there, and made some of the key decisions, and his tale doesn't match the one
Oracle has been spinning for the jury. Instead, it matches Google's tale.
That's going to make things difficult for Oracle now!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Schwartz's revenge
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 08:17 AM EDT
Schwartz was incompetent, he ran sun into the ground. It is almost
inconceivable how he could have done any more damage to sun, and it's
shareholders.

It is clear the shareholder wanted to get rid of him and if they hadn't sold
the company he would of been fired.

He was so incompetent it's questionable whether had any idea of what he
was doing when he was supposedly running the company.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )