decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Schwartz: Android was to Java as Linux was to Unix. | 438 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
the silver lining
Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 01:56 PM EDT
Quote:

But really, Schwartz and Sun might have had another enemy in mind.

“Imagine for a moment if Google selected Microsoft Windows,” Schwartz said,
explaining that was the only other option at the time besides an open source
Java implementation.

Thus for Schwartz, the silver lining for him was that at least this way, Google
could be a part of the community.

---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

@CalebGarling (Ouch!)
Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 01:58 PM EDT
Caleb Garling ‏ @CalebGarling

Schwartz is submarining Oracle's case just a tad faster than he submarined Sun
Microsystems

---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Schwartz: Android was to Java as Linux was to Unix.
Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 02:04 PM EDT
James Niccolai ‏ @jniccolai

Schwartz: Android was to Java as Linux was to Unix. We couldn't stop it, no
sense pounding our fists on table, had to embrace it

---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

This is the first time Oracle looks nervous
Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 02:14 PM EDT
Rachel King ‏ @ZDNetRachel

Oracle resorted to a catty takedown of former Sun CEO Schwartz, which didn't
really work. This is the first time Oracle looks nervous

---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

TCK Not necessary
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 02:23 PM EDT
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/trial-former- sun-ceo-g ets-into-catty-fight-with-oracle-lawyer/75463
Although Schwartz saw the emails for the first time on the stand, Schwartz remarked that Rubin “was inflating the right to implement those APIs and call them Java.” Basically, Schwartz thought Rubin was making a big deal out of nothing, adding that the TCK was only necessary to call a product Java.
Um, yes.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Tweet from Schwartz - paid $45 by court
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 02:34 PM EDT
@OpenJonathan
Court pays $45 for testifying. I'm spending it on Über.

Did he get fees from Google also, or is that court fee the
lot? :O

Very cool.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Schwartz off the stand, easily the heaviest testimony so far
Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 04:09 PM EDT
Caleb Garling ‏ @CalebGarling

Schwartz off the stand, easily the heaviest testimony so far

---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Trial: Former Sun CEO gets into catty fight with Oracle lawyer
Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 04:13 PM EDT
Trial: Former Sun CEO gets into catty fight with Oracle lawyer

---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Miguel de Icaza (Gnome/Mono) spar-tweeting with Jonathan Schwartz
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 06:53 PM EDT
Hmmm.. I wonder what that is about. Does anyone know the
full-story there? Miguel de Icaza seems to be implying that
Schwartz was no friend of Open Source when he was at Sun.And
yet, Schwartz's history (as described in wikipedia) are all
pro-opensource. I am more than a bit confused. Where can I
find insights and background to this tweet-back-and-forth
between the two.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )