decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The problem is, time | 238 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The problem is, time
Authored by: Kilz on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 12:29 PM EDT
Thanks for that PJ, but the time factor and the fact they
cant bring in new evidence even stops them spinning and
dancing that in some way they think to spin it to their
advantage. While I agree that they are stuck with the
registrations, I also know that BSF would do their best to
try and distract downplay the facts with something. Since the
can only bring up things that Google does now, I hope it will
stop that dance.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The problem is, time
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 05:37 PM EDT
I thought one of the reports said that the judge would allow Oracle to introduce
new evidence if it can find any of the copyright registrations it needs?

That said, I strongly suspect that they've sunk their own ship here. Oracle got
caught talking out of both sides of its mouth and they're about to get punished
for that. Google has probably been checking up on this since Monday.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )