decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Incorrect link for footnote 5 in 982 | 238 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
"taken individually as as a unit" to "taken individually and as a unit"
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 09:30 AM EDT
near the top

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Corrections here please
Authored by: feldegast on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 09:42 AM EDT
a number of ? in the document should be other characters,
quotes of one type or another or a #

---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

3rd paragragh of 970 text
Authored by: Christian on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 11:26 AM EDT
There is a large block of extra text inserted in the middle of the correct text
(everything between "supporting" and "reconsideration" and I
think). According to the PDF, it should be this:

(ECF No. 777 at 2.) Oracle also stated that it had "substantial arguments
supporting reconsideration, raising a credible prospect that one or more of the
rejections will be reversed by the examiners." (Id.) It was for this reason
that Oracle made its withdrawal conditional.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"It was for this rason" ---> reason ? n/t
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 07:54 PM EDT
n/t

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"UPDATED WITH TEXT DOCUMEN" to "UPDATED WITH TEXT DOCUMENTS"
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 10:43 PM EDT
Attack of the docu men? (Correction needed in article title.)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Incorrect link for footnote 5 in 982
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 09:49 AM EDT
Page 7 of 982 the link to footnote 5 is wrong as actual foot
note is at the end footnote 4 [... (Dkt. 525 at 15). 5 For
reasons relating...]. The hyperlink for this 982 footnote 5
incorrectly links
to (plain text)
http://groklawstatic.ibiblio.org/article.php%3f
story=20120426075025438#foot5


[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )