decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
And they said there won't be any "Perry Mason Moments" | 238 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Day 8 Filing Teeth; Google Specifies what must be the Limits of Oracle's Copyright Claims
Authored by: PJ on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 11:14 AM EDT
I think it's the most brilliant chess move
I've ever seen in a courtroom. It's a
privilege just to watch this. Doesn't mean
it will prevail, but man oh man, what a
move.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Find the Lady
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 11:22 AM EDT
"[Did all the lawyers miss this? Did Oracle know and try and slide it by?
Did Google know, trap, and wait to pounce? ...]"


No, Yes, Yes

(it's not a compilation, it's a collection!, but it's "work as
whole",except all these bits are individually "works as a
whole")

IM(NS)HO IANAL

Boies: "It's not a compilation, no analysis is required"
Boies: "I think that's right" (to confused Judge),
Boies: "I'm not explaining that very well"
Boies: "Each of the APIs is a work as a whole, it's like 37 Journal
articles"

It may not actually have been Boies who said each of those things.


I have no idea what I'm talking about.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

And they said there won't be any "Perry Mason Moments"
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 12:57 PM EDT
Ha!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Day 8 Filing Teeth; Google Specifies what must be the Limits of Oracle's Copyright Claims
Authored by: Wol on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 06:10 PM EDT
I suspect Google trapped.

Why else should they bring up the fact large chunks of Java were written by 3rd
parties?

They may even have planned to bring in the copyright registrations themselves
(Oracle could hardly have objected, could they?). But Oracle themselves brought
them in, and handed Google their own head on a plate.

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )