decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Who'd want to be a Judge around a geek | 394 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Who'd want to be a Judge around a geek
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 07:48 PM EDT
with due respect too all involved

this is the best part so far
Judge: Is an API the same thing as a package? If not, what is the difference?

Dan Bornstein: You can slice and dice it different ways. "It's all kind of contextual."

Judge: Let me ask the same yes/no question… Is an API the same thing as a package?

Dan Bornstein: No. It could be, though.
and it's why you can define an API

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Assumes facts not in evidence (n/t)
Authored by: hardmath on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 07:53 PM EDT
.


---
"Prolog is an efficient programming language because it is a very stupid theorem
prover." -- Richard O'Keefe

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Boies twisting again
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 10:10 PM EDT
It is not even Apache that he should have been
referring to. The way the question is phrased,
I would think, no, the Apache web server does
not have any FOU restrictions.

Likely why there was no objection.


---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apache Field of Use Restriction
Authored by: Dave on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 12:26 AM EDT
"Did you know that Apache had field of use restrictions on it? Also, have
you stopped beating your wife?"

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apache Field of Use Restriction - not needed, it isn't JAVA
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 05:29 AM EDT
How about "As far as I'm aware, it doesn't have any as it's not called
Java!"

YellowShed

PS am loving this Google gameplay, just a shame it's such high stakes for the
OSS world. Bye bye Oracle.....

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )