decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Not know? | 394 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
whoops
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 06:00 PM EDT
In most fiction anthologies, each story is individually and explicitly
copyrighted to the author and those are listed in the front matter of the
volume.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Not know?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 06:05 PM EDT
Isn't Google pointing out that they DID know... it was stated in an earlier
filing?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

whoops
Authored by: jvillain on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 06:07 PM EDT
If it's a registration problem, presumably Oracle could reregister, but it's too late for this case, and likely any derivative works

I think it is possibly more damaging than that. Even if Oracle does change their copyright I don't think it would be retroactive. There is now (presumably) a published book out there with an invalid copyright. If I worked off of it, it would be unfair to make me scrap my work later. As well if Oracle will likely have to change the type of copyright so that they only have control over the parts that they actually wrote or had assigned to them.

It is possible that Oracle will leave the copyright part of the case in worse shape than before they brought the case and will have lost more control of Java. We will have to wait and see. But this could be a real reap what you sow moment.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • whoops - Authored by: eachus on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 12:06 AM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )