Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

'702 patent not to be allowed back in play | 394 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Great News! Thank you! n/t

Authored by: jbb on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 09:58 PM EDT

.

---
Our job is to remind ourselves that there are more contexts than the one we’re
in now — the one that we think is reality.
-- Alan Kay

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

'702 patent not to be allowed back in play

Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 10:00 PM EDT

Link

---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Cool! - n/t

Authored by: Gringo_ on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 10:08 PM EDT

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Mueller spins this as still positive for Oracle

Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 04:22 AM EDT

That guy is priceless.

He's at least 100% consistently against anything Google-
related regardless of the facts.

Latest view is that because the patent is valid, Google will
still have to license it to avoid having to repackage apps
specifically for each manufacturer's handsets.

I wonder if this patent can/will be re-re-examined? They
found it invalid twice, once finally. I have no idea what
the lifecycle of these things is, but it's obviously rather
complicated.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Mueller spins this as still positive for Oracle - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 04:42 AM EDT
If the accused insists he is innocent, his lawyer will do so too - Authored by: Winter on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 04:42 AM EDT
- If the accused insists he is innocent, his lawyer will do so too - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 05:01 AM EDT
  - If the accused insists he is innocent, his lawyer will do so too - Authored by: Gringo_ on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 07:02 AM EDT
Btw, Mueller is not priceless, he most definitely has a price N/T - Authored by: Winter on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 04:44 AM EDT
- Btw, Mueller is not priceless, he most definitely has a price N/T - Authored by: cricketjeff on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 07:15 AM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )