decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The APIs are copyrightable, but not on their own, moving on... | 238 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The APIs are copyrightable, but not on their own, moving on...
Authored by: Tyro on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 02:56 PM EDT
It doesn't really matter how he arrived at this decision. It matters that he
appears to have. I find that the rules of this discussion board forbid my
describing how I feel about someone who would make that decision, even on his
own, and without wider repercussions. When such a one masks his (malicious?)
actions under a cloak of authority... (I can accept the possibility that it is
not an intentionally malicious decision, it is as least irresponsibly and
recklessly destructive. And I'm afraid that I am finding it impossible to
consider lack of malice as plausible, only possible...like throwing 10 heads in
a row, one doubts that the coin is honest.)

The only fortunate thing about such a decision is that it will probably destroy
the country so quickly that it can't export the infection to others. And it
thoroughly convinces me that only GPL3 software is even relatively safe to
depend on.

N.B.: The exact same arguments could be applied to coding in assembler, so
there is really no escape. This would destroy the entire computer industry.

Do I think the country would survive long enough for an appeal to reach the
Supreme Court? I'm dubious. It's not like the economy is healthy at the moment
anyway. Even if it does, it's likely to be so damaged by the time that a
decision is reached that Somalia will have a larger GNP.

P.S.: I doubt that there will be an appeal. My expectation is that if he
pushes this decision, Google will win the case, leaving the precedent embedded
in case law.

Thinking further, this probably will have a subterranean effect, with it's
actions hidden from view. Most often people will just avoid actions that would
be threatened, and so no software will be developed in the US, and imports will
be carefully restricted, hemmed about by legal denyability, so that software
companies can't be bound by US law. (This has already started to happen, so
this will just increase the speed and strength of an already existing state of
affairs...and thus be invisible.)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )