decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Has Google Really Fragmented Java? | 503 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Has Google Really Fragmented Java?
Authored by: Gringo_ on Sunday, April 22 2012 @ 12:22 PM EDT

Way up above, I made a comment under the heading "Google did not fragment Java". My argument was "Google uses Harmony. Harmony is not Java (thanks to Sun not giving it the TCK) so how can anybody say Google fragmented Java?"

After writing that, I thought to myself - it is a pretty weak argument. Also, at the moment I wrote it, I was confusing Harmony with the language, but of course, it is not the language, but rather, an API just like Java's API. However, though there was confusion in my mind, that did not end up disqualifying what I actually wrote.

What Google did was to create a platform - Android, using Harmony and Delvik, that anybody can use. That platform certainly isn't Java. However, anybody can download the Java SE JDK and make programs to run on that platform. Then if somebody wants to say that act causes fragmentation of Java, it is the user of the Android platform who is responsible - not Google. They set the table, but it is the user who eats diner. If one is going to say that the existence of Android results in fragmentation of Java, then one needs to state more accurately "Android developers are fragmenting Java". If there were no Android developers, there would be no debate about fragmentation.

I think it is a long stretch to accuse Google of "fragmenting the Java platform" as if they had done something bad. To say such a thing is only hyperbole to make Google look bad. It is very debatable if this harms Java in any way at all. I don't think it does. I think it is a benefit to the continued existence of Java. It may only be a harm Oracle's ambitions. In fact, the code Android developer write that is pure Java SE and doesn't touch on Google' libraries, is copy and paste compatible with other Java SE projects they might develop for other platforms. Suppose you developed a class to parse your new hyper-xml scripts, based on Java's xml parser, for your Android project. Then later, you find a use for your hyper-xml scripts on some other platform. You can just plug in the class you used for your Android project. Then Android is a net gain for Java.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )