decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Collateral damage | 503 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Collateral damage
Authored by: stegu on Monday, April 23 2012 @ 05:33 AM EDT
Oracle does business internationally, so
it would matter, at least in that respect.

A lot of things Oracle is doing, and a lot
of things any software company is doing,
would become impossible to do if Oracle prevails.

I don't think Oracle fully appreciates the
collateral damage this case could cause.
It's like they hired a group of geeks to
customize their car, but the geeks have now
turned out to be mad scientists fitting the
car with a nuclear self-destruct device and
discussing when they should do their full
scale test of it inside the garage. The options
of doing the test launch at a remote location
or not testing it at all do not occur to them,
and that a nuke in a car was a bad idea in
the first place is beyond their comprehension.

Asserting copyright on an API is a terribly
bad idea.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Judge Alsup Decides He, Not the Jury, Will Decide the Issue of API Copyrightability ~pj
Authored by: Steve Martin on Monday, April 23 2012 @ 06:39 AM EDT

Any copyrights held by the U.S. government are not enforceable within the U.S.

That is not quite what the linked material says. Quote:

Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government, but the United States Government is not precluded from receiving and holding copyrights transferred to it by assignment, bequest, or otherwise.

This says that anything authored by the U.S. Government is not subject to copyright protecton, but that the U.S. Government can receive and hold copyrights in works authored by others. Nowhere does it say that those assigned copyrights cannot be enforced in the U.S.

I do not know the authorship of the Ada language. If it was authored by the U.S. Government, I'll grant your premise that it is unprotected. If, on the other hand, it was authored by others and the copyright rights assigned to the government, I'm not so sure.

As a side note, it would be nice if there were some similar exclusion of rights to patents.

---
"When I say something, I put my name next to it." -- Isaac Jaffe, "Sports Night"

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )