decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Software patents at Santa Clara | 104 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Software patents at Santa Clara
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, April 21 2012 @ 11:19 AM EDT

Software patents at Santa Clara announces a conference where lawyers will discuss the legal details of how to end the software patent mess.

In PJ's comment to the news pick, she asks why they exclude the technical geeks and only invite lawyers. The answer looks simple: They are there to discuss the legal technicalities of how to outlaw software patents, not the moral and scientific reasons why they are bad in the first place.

Put another way, this seems like a meeting to figure out how to hack the law so it no longer sucks, and a lot of people talking about why it sucks or why code is math would just be a distraction preventing them from concentrating on fixing the bug.

Any geek who has worked hard to fix a really bad bug knows how distracting it is to have users shouting complaints at them during such a task, and I guess the lawyers feel the same.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )