|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, April 21 2012 @ 07:57 AM EDT |
IIRC, Phillips were rather upset about DRM infected CDs carrying the CD-Logo as
they were no longer to the CD spec (or something like that) and stopped the
practice.
Sun Vs MS was about the Java trademark. MS were clearly trying to confuse
people that their Java was Java and so programmers would get hooked and then
find that the WORA of Java failed and the repsonse would be to buy MS.
Google has NEVER said Android was Java. Only that Java /can/ be used to write
apps. If MS has said that their Visual-J (for want of a better name) /could/ be
programmed with Java, but was not itself Java and not guaranteed to be
compatible with any other Java (and had no Java logo), then I'm sure Sun would
not have gone after them. But would MS really have done that...[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|