decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Neither | 178 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
News Pick If Lawyers Sell Legal Expertise to Clients, Who Owns the Resulting Product?
Authored by: dio gratia on Friday, April 20 2012 @ 07:46 PM EDT
Notice the comments in Susan Hackett's column all focus on 'sweat-of-the-brow'
arguments.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Neither
Authored by: artp on Friday, April 20 2012 @ 08:59 PM EDT
It's a work for hire. The client owns it.

Not really joking. It has little utility and no direct
applicability outside of the narrow case that it was written
for. Granted that an industry has sprung up to reuse these
writings in reapplication to other cases. But every case
seems to call for a new amalgam.

---
Userfriendly on WGA server outage:
When you're chained to an oar you don't think you should go down when the galley
sinks ?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Neither - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 20 2012 @ 09:50 PM EDT
  • Neither - Authored by: dio gratia on Friday, April 20 2012 @ 10:19 PM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )