decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more... 		decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

Donate Paypal

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Sounds like a TSA mishap | 270 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Sounds like a TSA mishap
Authored by: Crocodile_Dundee on Friday, April 20 2012 @ 03:04 AM EDT
Some discussion here is Australia is that the wording used seems similar to one
used by the TSA to "ask" to prevent people boarding aircraft.

The suggestion is that she may be on a US no-fly list.

The fact that the US's no-fly list causes an Australian citizen to be detained
when travelling on an Australian passport to Australia via a non-US carrier, and
not passing through the US is a bit of a worry (apparently she eventually went
via HK which means she never went anywhere near the US, I have no idea if the
original route was via the US)

If this is true then it simply means that it's not wise to be a lawyer acting
for someone the US isn't particularly happy with.

It's somewhat extraordinary, but as long as the word "rendition"
doesn't get added to that, it's no worse than embarrassing for everyone.

---
---
That's not a law suit. *THIS* is a law suit!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details ) 		Site layout based on Woodlands theme by Bryan Bell.
Groklaw logo by John Crowley.
News Picks logo by Ted Thompson.
Powered By GeekLog
Created this page in 0.04 seconds