decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Number of programmers... a piece of fiction. | 270 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Number of programmers... a piece of fiction.
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 20 2012 @ 09:33 AM EDT
The large numbers thrown around for numbers of programmers
etc. are purely there in order to imply massive investment
and huge value of Java, to inflate the idea of damages.

What these programmers were working on was more likely not
the core java APIs (J2SE stuff), but probably lots of the
various J2EE and external APIs which seem to spring up every
7 minutes and make it so hard to keep ones' knowledge up to
date with the platform.

The core java APIs *shouldn't* change that often (and AFAIK
don't). If they do it's because they are badly designed, and
isn't something to brag about.

It's like the 7 billion dollar figure that they are trying
to imply is the value of Java. It's completely disconnected
from the value of Java, just as these numbers of programmers
is disconnected from the people working on the APIs in
question.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )