|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 19 2012 @ 07:01 PM EDT |
... and only the most sensational perspective to go by.
As far as the
main media is concerned, Google is already paying the damages. Ok, not quite,
but with how most of them are presenting what's going on, Google might as well
be.
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 19 2012 @ 07:13 PM EDT |
Same, I'd be glad to toss some money to help offset costs of Groklaw's
excellent reporters. Seriously Groklaw is outdoing every other news outlet with
respect to this case! No other reporters that I have seen have bothered to
produce anything resembling a word for word transcript. Instead they just latch
onto one or two sensational (sounding) parts and ignore the rest. Kinda missing
the forest for the trees. :/
Seriously, if only the quality of reporting
were this good with day to day news... [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: mexaly on Thursday, April 19 2012 @ 07:36 PM EDT |
I'll pile on my words of gratitude: you rock!
---
IANAL, but I watch actors play lawyers on high-definition television.
Thanks to our hosts and the legal experts that make Groklaw great.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Gringo_ on Thursday, April 19 2012 @ 07:50 PM EDT |
Likewise - thanks. I so enjoyed your reporting - much more
than I have any of the reports by the so called "professional
reporters".[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 19 2012 @ 07:53 PM EDT |
| Agreed, some excellent work! [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Thursday, April 19 2012 @ 09:04 PM EDT |
ABSOLUTELY
The Groklaw reporters are doing a fantastic job.
---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.
"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: snakebitehurts on Thursday, April 19 2012 @ 09:15 PM EDT |
Thank you for your hard work. You efforts are much appreciated.
MikeD[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: mirrorslap on Thursday, April 19 2012 @ 10:00 PM EDT |
PJ has taught us well. I have been fortunate to have read the work of the
Groklaw reporters covering SCO v. Novell; they set the standard.
One of the things that PJ taught us is that we are looking for is data, not
spin. So that's what I do my best to bring. She also said that our
impressions are incredibly valuable: demeanor, tone of voice, posture, are
never conveyed in the court reporter's transcript. She also tells us not to try
to record everything, just try to get what appears to be important. It's all
super instruction.
To the idea that Google trying to game the system and get Oracle to
needlessly burn their minutes, I caught not one whiff of that from Google's
team, and the Judge has made it incedibly clear that he is aware of the the
tactic, is sensitive to it (he *did* ask Google about that directly), and that
the knife cuts both ways. He has made that clear, as well as making clear
that exhibits come into evidence through stipulation (agreement of the
parties), or if there is no agreement,, through establishing a foundation via
a witness who has direct knowledge of the evidence. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Crocodile_Dundee on Friday, April 20 2012 @ 03:23 AM EDT |
I too thank them.
I've tried it and it's really hard. I don't know how they manage to get such a
coherent report.
---
---
That's not a law suit. *THIS* is a law suit![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: lnuss on Friday, April 20 2012 @ 05:55 AM EDT |
Thanks again...
---
Larry N.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Ian Al on Friday, April 20 2012 @ 07:50 AM EDT |
No text would be enough.
---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
