|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 19 2012 @ 05:30 AM EDT |
I think the judge knows how to do his job and no amount of armchair
judging is going to change the way he does his job :)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 19 2012 @ 06:16 AM EDT |
Since they are spending a lot of their time one a dead-end path, Google are
probably betting that they can invalidate it with far less effort.
What's that line about not interupting your enemy when they're making a mistake?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: PJ on Thursday, April 19 2012 @ 08:12 AM EDT |
Well, in a perfect world, maybe. Here, on planet
earth, in 2012, we see lawyers say whatever they
think will work, some with more truth than others.
The judge does notice. But it's an advocacy system,
meaning he knows, and subtracts, from both sides'
advocacy, knowing it is what it is, and his job is
to let the jury hear the advocacy but make sure that
the evidence follows the rules. There's a reason
he just told the jury that nothing a lawyer says
is evidence.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|