decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Oracle v. Google - What's the Deal With the TCK License? | 234 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Oracle v. Google - What's the Deal With the Java Specification License?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 02:04 PM EDT
Oops. I think my third phrase was meant to be "relied on", rather than
repetition of the first.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Oracle v. Google - What's the Deal With the TCK License?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 04:27 PM EDT
AFAICT Google was toying with the notion of taking a license
during the 2005/6 negotiations, but, a JME & TCK license would
have been necessary to satisfy the handset makers and carriers
who wanted to see genuine Java(TM). The TCK and JME licenses
would have thwarted Google's ambition to release their code
under a non-Sun, non-GPL open source license.

Along came Harmony, and it was obvious that anyone could make
their own VM and supporting APIs and libraries, so long as they
didn't call it Java. Larry E seems a bit upset that he paid $7.4Bn
[disputed] for a filing cabinet.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )