|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 03:37 PM EDT |
| I haven't heard anything for a while. Is the day over? [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 04:34 PM EDT |
Alsup to Jury: The $7.4 billion dollar number has nothing to with
this case
If Oracle keeps wanting to pound that number.... I'm sure the
Judge can keep reminding the Jury it's meaningless :)
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 06:13 PM EDT |
I wonder if that was an attempted Perry Mason moment. An email perhaps not
disclosed in Oracle's list.
Ooops...
I especially like the
part:
Oracle counsel not happy
If that - and it's just my supposition -
is really what happened, perhaps Boies will reconsider his strategy of not
following Court Rules regarding proper disclosure and
discovery....
Nah... that's not likely to change without heavy personal
sanctions strong enough to make that kind of "business activity"
unprofitable.
I would Love to see that:
Counsel A: we will use emails
1 3 5 and 9 as evidence
Counsel B: ok...
At trial:
Counsel A:
we would like to submit email 7 as evidence
Counsel B: we object,
wasn't properly disclosed
Judge: Witness, do you recognize said
object?
Witness: Sorry your honor, I reviewed all the material that was
identified as evidence to be submitted with regards my own personal
understanding of it... that just wasn't on the list... it could be
anything!
Judge: Objection granted, email 7 will not be entered into
evidence!
Counsel A: DOH!
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: tqft on Thursday, April 19 2012 @ 02:45 AM EDT |
The six above
https://twitter.com/#!/tqft9999/googlevoracle
---
anyone got a job good in Brisbane Australia for a problem solver? Currently
under employed in one job.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
