|
| Authored by: Ian Al on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 03:35 AM EDT |
Don't worry about some missed replies. The context you are laying down will
provide the answers.
Another excellent and detailed report.
Thankyou
---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 04:04 AM EDT |
I fully agree. The eye witness report is of very high quality. I think the best
I have seen in the life of Groklaw. It is realy cool to read the action 10,000
miles away from the court room.
Thanks
Marc
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: darrellb on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 07:30 AM EDT |
| Thanks to everyone who is sending first person accounts!! [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: lnuss on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 08:44 AM EDT |
Thanks again to our reporters -- it's outstanding!
---
Larry N.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Kilz on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 09:01 AM EDT |
Thanks mirror_slap for your time and effort to keep us all
informed. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: NigelWhitley on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 11:22 AM EDT |
It's enormously helpful to get such a complete picture of the proceeding,
including your own comments which go beyond the bare words. As IanAL has said,
it doesn't matter if some of the replies are missing - we'll eventually get the
court transcript to fill in the gaps. But the reports let us form an opinion on
how the case is proceeding, without the spin from the commercial media. Much
appreciated. And that applies to the earlier and subsequent reporters too.
---------------
Nigel Whitley[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: RPN on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 12:36 PM EDT |
Agreed. The detail is astonishing and greatly appreciated.
Thank you very much to the reporters today and yesterday.
Richard.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
