decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
It's Oracles Turn | 342 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Big Honking Smoking Gun
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 08:23 AM EDT
My guess is that the Google lawyers are staging their cards to play them at the
right time. If they played all their cards in the first salvo at Ellison, they
would have little or nothing when he comes back ( which I believe is scheduled
for today.

There is more than enough ammunition to fire at the right time.

They clearly caught Ellison contradicting himself when he was asked if Java was
free and he responded " I am not sure" when in his deposition he
responded yes.

I expect that the Google Lawyers will systematically destroy Ellison's
credibility and will leave the jury with the impression that he (Oracle) are
misrepresenting the facts. The more that Google can discredit each core witness,
the weaker the case for Oracle will become. It also gives the judge the facts to
make his rulings.

I have not seen anything from Oracle that can use to turn the tables in their
favour.

In our wildest dreams, this case could be over well before the scheduled
duration.

CC :>)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Big Honking Smoking Gun
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 08:57 AM EDT
I think the answer from Ellison was just crudely phrased. What he meant was to
replace Dalvik with the JVM.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Big Honking Smoking Gun
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 09:20 AM EDT
IBM's Java license was up in 2015, and a deal was struck was
that Oracle gave IBM some terms good enough to package IBM's
withdrawal from the Harmony/Apache implementation as a
prerequisite. Job done, next target to bury the Harmony
project was Google.

I think fundamentally, Oracle is keen to monetise what Sun
gave away for free. Their difficulty is they have nothing to
bring to the table to incent Google to hand over control of
their own destiny. Other than this bodge of a legal
position.

Interesting thing is that one of Oracle's big "go to
markets" is in the Big Data arena, where Cloudera are a key
partner. Cloudera's implementation of Hadoop relies on good
will from Google not to assert their MapReduce patents. I
sometimes wonder if Google would ever choose to impose use
restrictions on that licensing agreement in a way unhelpful
to Oracle...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

It's Oracles Turn
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 12:10 PM EDT
Let them make their case

Let them build their house of cards

Undermine them on cross

Be Patient. Wait your Turn.

Van Nest said it during opening.

"They go first, keep an open mind"

AFAIR


[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )