[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I don't think Google can successfully object to that e-mail, except maybe if Oracle hasn't lain a proper basis for it. But, once Oracle introduces it and goes on at length about it, Google can then turn around and point out the date (undermining all of Oracle's work by making it obvious to the jury that Oracle's trying to be deceptive about when the e-mail occurred), the fact that Lindholm isn't a lawyer and isn't in a position to make statements about what the law says Google needs to do, and so on.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

• augmentable but not admissable? - Authored by: darrellb on Tuesday, April 17 2012 @ 01:41 PM EDT
  • augmentable but not admissable? - Authored by: tknarr on Tuesday, April 17 2012 @ 02:16 PM EDT