|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 17 2012 @ 07:25 AM EDT |
This is more like appeal proofing.
Google can still object to every item brought in[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: rocky on Tuesday, April 17 2012 @ 01:10 PM EDT |
ARRRGGHHHH! So infuriating! Quoting from Judge Alsup's order:
"Although it would have been better to have augmented sooner,..."
[like MONTHS ago, instead of purposefully waiting until the actual start of the
trial?]
"...there is still time to adjust prior to the actual use at trial of these
exhibits..."
[Oh, so the trial has already started, but Google has now been assigned a night
shift job. While handling the actual trial during the day, they need to analyze
these new documents Oracle plans to use and build their defenses for them, while
getting no sleep.]
"...and Google has shown no prejudice."
[They didn't think they needed to spell it out in extensive detail because it is
blindingly obvious to everyone.]
"Both sides will be given some opportunity to adjust the exhibit list.
Google will get the same flexibility so long as it acts timely."
[Timely?!?! None of this is timely. And giving Google the same opportunity is
ridiculous; Google doesn't need or want to game the system like this.]
"At some point, however, augmentation of the exhibit list will be
terminated with or without prejudice."
[Oh my. At some point? Will that be before or after the trial is over?]
This was a motion that should have earned them a metaphorical smack upside the
back of the head for trying something so annoying and stupid, but instead, it
was granted? Hey, rewarding bad behavior--yay![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
