Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

That wasn't a cray. | 311 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Sweeeeeeeeet!

Authored by: greed on Monday, April 16 2012 @ 06:26 PM EDT

I know I do, and I just grit my teeth and keep quiet every time they make a
circuit with a single point of contact.

Bi-directional circuit, too.

High-bandwidth low-latency bi-directional circuit.

And, according to the Mythbusters, they could have skipped all that elaborate
break-in stuff with the temperature and just held up a blanket. Or put a piece
of glass over the sensor.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

That wasn't a cray.

Authored by: jesse on Monday, April 16 2012 @ 07:04 PM EDT

Cray told the production that they would not sell to a mob controlled company (I
believe all sales were vetted by the DoD).

So the production cobbled together some stuff similar to the cray IOS wings, but
there were more boxes added to prevent it from being mistook... And carefully
did not put any logo on it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

That wasn't a cray. - Authored by: sysprog on Monday, April 16 2012 @ 07:31 PM EDT
- That wasn't a cray. - Authored by: jesse on Tuesday, April 17 2012 @ 08:44 AM EDT
That wasn't a cray. - Authored by: greed on Monday, April 16 2012 @ 09:07 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )