decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
How to avoid a total loss: Don't put all your eggs in one basket! | 311 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
How to avoid a total loss: Don't put all your eggs in one basket!
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 16 2012 @ 09:07 PM EDT

Proper diversification in your portfolio means you don't have everything in high risk where you could loose it all.

That makes sense to me. That decreases the high risk with lower risk investments. Low risk investments that are detached from the high risk so you don't just have the illusion of safety.

But buying a given stock - like SCOG.x while short-selling it? The broker that handled the transaction for you is thrilled you wanted to pay him for - effectively - nothing.

I should add: my opinion on the aspect of how hedging is handled is due to a number of brokers wanting to sell the technique but none of them wanting to actually clarify how it worked. When presented with actual scenarios, they would rather choose to no longer discuss the technique. Perhaps some day I'll find someone willing to discuss it to show it would properly function in a fairly simple scenario. And by that I mean: actually work the numbers out on paper.

When I go to get a bank loan and we're discussing different payment options, and I have questions, the banker is willing to actually work the numbers out on paper to show how they work. I don't think it's too much to ask for someone trying to sell you on the idea of hedging to do the same.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )