|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 16 2012 @ 08:13 PM EDT |
Even if it's backwards, so what? Google copied "write once, run
anywhere"? And, um, well, did you patent it? No? (p-code would probably
be prior art, at a minimum.) Did Google copy your code that implemented it?
No? Then shove of.
Oh, you claim the answer to some of those was yes? Well, you're going to
actually have to prove it, not just make claims...
MSS2[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 16 2012 @ 10:25 PM EDT |
Google it, everybody is quoting Wired.
I found only two prior quotes, both jokes...
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 17 2012 @ 12:42 AM EDT |
Ummm, then is Esperanto copyrighted or "copyrightable"? Seems to me
the footgun just went off again.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Ian Al on Tuesday, April 17 2012 @ 10:23 AM EDT |
Program apps in Java, instead?
I don't think I understand what he is getting at. What does Java programming do
for pushing updates on the Android platform?
---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 17 2012 @ 10:41 AM EDT |
Oddly enough, I recall hearing that Klingon is now more
likely to be used internationally than Esperanto.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
