decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Not that simple | 328 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
upheld a ban on "push" emails in Apple's iCloud and MobileMe services
Authored by: darrellb on Sunday, April 15 2012 @ 07:44 AM EDT
Seems like postal mail is prior art for any push technology. Letters are clearly
pushed from sender to receiver. It would be kind of absurd for me to
periodically poll all my regular mailers and ask if they have anything for me.
And how would I ever get mail from unknown senders?

---
darrellB

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

no less valid than a patent on a rectangular glass slate
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, April 15 2012 @ 10:00 AM EDT

Apple did this to themselves.

Hopefully this will ultimately lead to the implosion of the world patents
offices.

I suspect there's too many lawyers in the world to let that happen.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Encryption: Ceasar Cipher
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, April 15 2012 @ 10:52 AM EDT

Encryption has been around for at least as long as Rome 2000 years ago.

Different encryption/decryption methods are older/newer. But encryption/decryption is all math based. Even the enigma machine - which was purely implemented mechanically - can be duplicated mathematically.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

A prior, patented, automated push technology
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, April 15 2012 @ 11:16 AM EDT
October 11, 1853. G.F. Milliken files for the patent of an automatic burglar alarm system where the remotely-located signal device (bell) indicates not only that an event has occurred but the precise location of said event. TTBOMK, current central station monitored alarms still use this concept with some variation in the information coding method. --DonW
Electric Burglar Alarm / Facts

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple have a licence
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, April 15 2012 @ 04:35 PM EDT
AFAIK Apple have a licence from MS for push email from MSExchange.
But of course MS will do it their own way, not in accordance with
international standards or industry good practice. That means anyone
wanting push email from a non-Exchange system has to pay tax
to whatever lucky devil got a gold card from USPTO.

Yes RIM do it their own way too, but they also have a license from MS
for Exchange systems.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Not that simple
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 16 2012 @ 11:49 PM EDT

You've got

1) Patents covering existing Genes
2) Patents covering existing Plants/Animals
3) Patents covering minor modifications to genes (think Monsanto)
4) Patents covering minor modifications to Plants/Animals (glow in the dark
bunny rabbits)
5) Patents involving location of a mechanical switch (KSR v. Teleflex)
6) Patents involving patient treatment (Mayo v. Prometheus)

Software is only a minor part of the problem.

Wayne
http://madhatter.ca

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )