decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Meet the New Microsoft | 328 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Meet the New Microsoft
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, April 15 2012 @ 07:23 PM EDT
Complete indistinguishable from the Old Microsoft. Except that their monopoly
abuse is going on behind that curtain. Pay no attention to the monopolist
behind the curtain!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Yeah, provoking a Judge Jackson moment
Authored by: PJ on Sunday, April 15 2012 @ 10:38 PM EDT
It was more complex than that. They were under
court oversight until, what, a year ago? And
in my view, that was the beginning of the end
for Microsoft. Because before that trial,
mostly everyone in the public thought Microsoft
was wonderful. Vendors and competitors knew
they were not, but it was all quiet as far as
the public knew.

After the trial, and the verdict of guilty,
it was never the same for Microsoft. Its brand
was tarnished, and companies realized that each
one was not alone, that others had experienced
the same things.

Too much came out in public, including that
incredible demo of a Microsoft executive
showing a doctored demo to prove a ridiculous
point. The brand was never the same, and
I don't think it ever will be, because every
time Microsoft does something awful, like the
OOXML saga, everyone notices and they are very
willing to believe whatever surfaces, because
Microsoft's name is mud. It takes a long
time for company to die off, when they are as
rich as Microsoft, but the arrow is pointing
down.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )