decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more
but don't know where to look.
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
BK Timeline
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts
Courts
DRM
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IBM Timeline
Legal Docs
MS Litigation
Novell Appeal
Novell Timeline
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat
Salus Book
SCO
SCO Financials
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOBankruptcy
Sean Daly
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. PJ is a paralegal, not a lawyer. Even when lawyers write or contribute to articles, it is still not legal advice, because the lawyers authoring the articles are not your lawyers.

What's New

STORIES
1 story in last 48 hours

COMMENTS last 48 hrs

Notice of Agenda for Friday... [+22]

Microsoft Files Cross Motio... [+111]

Apple Wins Like a Champ - P... [+5]

Why the GPL Sinks SCO's Cop... [+16]

An Explanation of Computati... [+6]



Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
OT - Maybe I'm taking this wrong, but... | 251 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
EU "JURI" vote related to software patents: good outcome
Authored by: nb on Wednesday, February 02 2005 @ 03:33 PM EST
Breaking news: The vote in JURI on the software patents issue has resulted in
the best possible outcome: The process will be restarted with a new "first
reading". (My source for this news is a phone call from Brussels which
obviously I cannot link to, but I'm sure the press releases will come soon.)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Shhh! Here Comes Bill! Hide Your IPod!
Authored by: NetArch on Wednesday, February 02 2005 @ 04:22 PM EST
Ha!!! Too funny! Seems Microsoft is up to its ears in iPods...

Wired News articl e

---
NetArch - building a better Internet one subnet at a time...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

OT
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 02 2005 @ 05:23 PM EST
This is not necessarily a bad thing as such for Sun Customers. They will
benefit from having all thier software exposed so that if there is a problem,
they can see what is happening, and can get it fixed either by themselves or by
other Sun users. Likewise there are a number of Sun system users who would
dearly like to make improvements for both their own use and for use by other Sun
user's group members.

However what will be missing will be the synergy of merging Linux and Solaris,
the two operating systems borrowing the best parts of the other to obtain some
really brilliant breakthroughs.

It is understandable that some people will be disappointed that instead of
getting a space craft they got a glider.

However remember this is a free world. If you want to work on Solaris you can.
If you want to work on Linux you can. You just have to be careful if you want
to do both, and it won't be as much fun, and some people in charge of Linux may
have to do a careful job of filtering changes from people working on Solaris to
make sure that Solaris patents don't creep into Linux. But that problem is no
different than it has ever been with anyone who works on both propriatary and
open source code.

In the long run, it will be the open source community at large freely deciding
what they want to do. It is understandable that people adhering to the GPL
license are disappointed that Solaris code will not be available. But MS code
hasn't been available either, and Linux runs circles at multiples the speed of
light around Windows.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Schwartz Questions and Answers?
Authored by: Simon G Best on Thursday, February 03 2005 @ 12:58 AM EST

Have I missed Schwartz' answers to the Groklaw questions, or hasn't he answered, yet? I'm beginning to wonder if he geuninely intended to take part in that, or was just taking it as an opportunity to get an idea, from the questions, of what matters to FOSSers and how FOSSers perceive Sun.

---
FOSS IS political. It's just that the political establishment is out of touch and hasn't caught up.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

OT - Maybe I'm taking this wrong, but...
Authored by: Juggler on Thursday, February 03 2005 @ 12:43 PM EST
To me this seems to be more of a preemptive move AGAINST Linux than anything.

If I'm a FOSS developer (I'm not), adding functionality to Linux seems to be
tougher. I now have to worry about not looking at any Solaris code. I'm sure
there's some nice functionality that Solaris has that Linux does not.

What happens when said functionality is added to Linux. I'm sure the Legal IP
Beagles at Sun will do a code review ala SCO, and say, "Linux has taken our
IP!"

Maybe I'm being harsh, but this appears to be exceptionally self-serving of
Sun.

Am I way off base?

--Alan L. Wagoner

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2009 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )