decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Judge Koh Unseals More Documents in Apple v. Samsung ~pj
Wednesday, September 19 2012 @ 08:18 PM EDT

Judge Lucy Koh continues to make Apple and Samsung unseal documents. And Samsung's outside law firm, Quinn Emanuel, has added another attorney from the LA office, Brett Dylan Proctor, who, I gather, is the fix-it guy who cleans up things that aren't going so perfectly. Here's his bio.

In this collection of 82 documents, one of Apple's exhibits stands out, a graphic [PDF] it prepared to show the jury what was different between Samsung's prior art, the DiamondTouch, and Apple's patents. Remember the jury foreman told the world that they decided Samsung's prior art, this very prior art, wasn't on point because iOS wouldn't run on the DiamondTouch or vice versa? Now look at the graphic. Nothing like that was listed by Apple regarding either the '381 or the '915 patents.

Just one more piece to show that the jury ran off the rails on this self-help version of how to evaluate prior art.

Interestingly, one of our questions is answered in this filing [PDF], on page 5, where Samsung says it provided Apple with source code for the DiamondTouch. So that explains how the jury had it avalable, I would assume.

Friends, I have the flu, and Mark's laptop is broken, so could you please post in your comments what you find in all the exhibits, if you find one of interest, so readers who stop by will have a map to find things? I just really can't think today for more than a few minutes at a time. Thanks, guys.

The filings:

1969 - Filed & Entered: 09/18/2012
Notice of Appearance
Docket Text: NOTICE of Appearance by Brett Dylan Proctor (Proctor, Brett) (Filed on 9/18/2012)

1970 - Filed & Entered: 09/18/2012
Notice (Other)
Docket Text: NOTICE by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC re [1966] Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal,,,,,,, Samsung's Proffer of Witness Testimony and Exhibits (Dkt. No. 1911) (Attachments: # ( 1) Notice of Manual Filing, # (2) Declaration of Diane Hutnyan in Support of Samsung's Proffer, # (3) Exhibit 1 to the Hutnyan Declaration, # (4) Exhibit 3 to the Hutnyan Declaration, # (5) Exhibit 4 to the Hutnyan Declaration, # (6) Exhibit 5 to the Hutnyan Declaration, # (7) Exhibit 6 to the Hutnyan Declaration, # (8) Exhibit 7 to the Hutnyan Declaration, # (9) Exhibit 8 to the Hutnyan Declaration, # (10) Exhibit 11 to the Hutnyan Declaration, # (11) Exhibit 12 to the Hutnyan Declaration, # (12) Exhibit 13 to the Hutnyan Declaration, # (13) Exhibit 15 to the Hutnyan Declaration, # (14) Exhibit 16 to the Hutnyan Declaration, # (15) Exhibit 17 to the Hutnyan Declaration, # (16) Declaration of Brett Arnold in Support of Samsung's Proffer, # (17) Exhibit B to the Arnold Declaration, # (18) Exhibit D to the Arnold Declaration, # (19) Exhibit E to the Arnold Declaration, # (20) Exhibit F to the Arnold Declaration, # (21) Exhibit G to the Arnold Declaration, # (22) Exhibit H to the Arnold Declaration, # (23) Exhibit I to the Arnold Declaration, # (24) Exhibit J to the Arnold Declaration, # (25) Exhibit K to the Arnold Declaration, # (26) Exhibit P to the Arnold Declaration, # (27) Exhibit U, V to the Arnold Declaration, # (28) Exhibit W to the Arnold Declaration, # (29) Exhibit X to the Arnold Declaration)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 9/18/2012)

1971 - Filed & Entered: 09/18/2012
Notice (Other)
Docket Text: NOTICE by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC re [1966] Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal,,,,,,,, Exhibits to Samsung's Notice of Filing of Excluded Closing Demonstratives (Dkt. No. 1919) (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 3, # (3) Exhibit 4, # (4) Exhibit 5, # (5) Exhibit 6)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 9/18/2012)

1972 - Filed & Entered: 09/18/2012
Notice (Other)
Docket Text: NOTICE by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC re [1966] Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal,,,,,,, Exhibits to Samsung's Corrected Notice of Filing of Excluded Exhibits (Dkt. No. 1918) (Attachments: # (1) Corrected Exhibit 62, # (2) Corrected Exhibit 69, # (3) Corrected Exhibit 86, # (4) Corrected Exhibit 88)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 9/18/2012)

1973 Filed & Entered: 09/18/2012
Notice (Other)
Docket Text: NOTICE by Apple Inc. Apple's Notice of Filing of Excluded Exhibits and Demonstratives (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 19, # (2) Exhibit 21, # (3) Exhibit 61, # (4) Exhibit 85, # (5) Exhibit 96, # (6) Exhibit 113, # (7) Exhibit 151, # (8) Exhibit 152, # (9) Exhibit 157, # (10) Exhibit 175, # (11) Exhibit 179, # (12) Exhibit 188, # (13) Exhibit 197, # (14) Exhibit 198, # (15) Exhibit 219, # (16) Exhibit 2040, # (17) Exhibit 2226, # (18) Exhibit 2321, # (19) Exhibit Closing Slide 37, # (20) Exhibit Closing Slide 45, # (21) Exhibit PDX14.4, # (22) Exhibit PDX14A.47, # (23) Exhibit PDX14A.48, # (24) Exhibit PDX14A.49, # (25) Exhibit PDX14A.50, # (26) Exhibit PDX14A.51, # (27) Exhibit PDX14A.52, # (28) Exhibit PDX20, # (29) Exhibit PDX21, # (30) Exhibit PDX22, # (31) Exhibit PDX28.17, # (32) Exhibit PDX28.25, # (33) Exhibit PDX28.27)(Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 9/18/2012)

1974 - Filed & Entered: 09/18/2012
Notice (Other)
Docket Text: NOTICE by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC re [1966] Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal,,,,,,,,,,,,, Exhibit 9 to Samsung's Objections and Responses Regarding Exhibits and Deposition Designations Disclosed on August 14, 2012 (Dkt. No. 1760) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 9/18/2012)

1975 - Filed & Entered: 09/18/2012
Notice (Other)
Docket Text: NOTICE by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC re [1966] Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Samsung's Objections and Responses Regarding (1) Exhibits To Be Used with Richard Howarth, Andries Van Dam, Stephen Gray, Vincent O'Brien, and David Teece and (2) Designated Deposition Testimony of Shin Nishibori and Brian Agnetta and Exhibits P and R (Dkt. No. 1735) (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit P, # (2) Exhibit R)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 9/18/2012)

1976 - Filed & Entered: 09/18/2012
Notice (Other)
Docket Text: NOTICE by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC re [1966] Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal,,,,,,,,,, Supplemental Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan In Support of Samsung's Proffer of Witness Testimony and Exhibits (Dkt. No. 1921) (Attachments: # (1) Notice of Manual Filing)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 9/18/2012)

1977 - Filed & Entered: 09/18/2012
Notice (Other)
Docket Text: NOTICE by Apple Inc. Manual Filing Notification of Excluded Exhibits and Demonstratives (PX41, PX49, PX50, PX64, PX66A, 66B, PX114, PX126, PX178, PDX23, PDX24, and Underlying Evid. for PX12, PX13, PX14) (Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 9/18/2012)

1978 - Filed & Entered: 09/18/2012
Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal
Docket Text: ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART APPLE'S AND SAMSUNG'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting in part and denying in part [602] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part [637] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying [642] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying [643] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part [707] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part [715] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part [736] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying [737] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying [754] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part [758] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part [759] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2012)


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )