decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Oracle v. Google Case Management Hearing Reset to June 20 ~ pj
Wednesday, June 06 2012 @ 01:12 AM EDT

The case management hearing in Oracle v. Google has been changed to June 20 at 11 AM. It was set for June 21, but Oracle's lawyer had a conflict. So if you were planning to go, reset your calendar. I'm thinking perhaps that's when we'll find out how the judge plans to handle the damages on the 9 lines that were mistakenly put in Android by their original author (who had then donated them to Java and been thanked for them) and the test files that never made it into Android that a contractor copied contrary to Google's instructions. Yes, friends, that's all there is to it.

And the judge has ordered the lawyers to pay Dr. James Kearl, the neutral technical adviser to the court, prior to the hearing. I'd only be guessing if I told you why that was necessary, or even if it was. This judge, as you've seen, likes to run a tight ship. But since both sides objected to Dr. Kearl's report and he never took the stand when it turned out there would not be a damages phase, maybe there was the hint of a perception in the air that it might not be at the top of anyone's To Do list.

No matter how I do the damages math, Oracle is in the red big time on this litigation. And Google, although it won, is still out millions to achieve it. Maybe that's why the judge is making sure Dr. Kearl gets paid. It's got to hurt. What a waste, when you think this money could have been spent on products for you and me, their customers, who in the end have to pay for everything, if you really think about it.

Here are the filings:

06/05/2012 - 1206 - ORDER REGARDING DR. JAMES KEARL. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 5, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2012) (Entered: 06/05/2012)

06/05/2012 - 1207 - STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Set/Reset Hearings Regarding Case Management Conference filed by Oracle America, Inc.. (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/5/2012) (Entered: 06/05/2012)

06/05/2012 - 1208 - ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION by Hon. William Alsup granting 1207 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2012) (Entered: 06/05/2012)

06/05/2012 - Set/Reset Hearing re 1204 Order Case Management Conference set for 6/20/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2012) (Entered: 06/05/2012)

Here's the order on resetting the hearing:

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a case management conference on June 21, 2012, at 11 a.m.;

WHEREAS, lead counsel for Oracle has a conflicting obligation in another case on that day; and

WHEREAS, the parties are both available for a case management conference on June 20, 2012, at 11 a.m., which date and time the Deputy Clerk has indicated is available on the Courtís calendar;

NOW THEREFORE THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE as follows:

1. The case management conference scheduled for June 21, 2012, at 11 a.m. shall be rescheduled for June 20, 2012, at 11 a.m.

ORDER

The foregoing stipulation is approved, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date:

Honorable William Alsup
Judge of the United States District Court


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )