Now that I've announced Groklaw articles will end in May, a number of lovely articles have appeared, and some beautiful comments have been posted here and elsewhere, not to mention a blizzard of emails I've received. Thank you, every one of you.
Some of you have asked me to figure out some place where the community can go to continue the work, even if I can't carry this work load any longer. I can't announce anything, but I will tell you that I'm trying to figure something out, and if it doesn't work out, it won't be because I haven't heard your concerns. I see your point, and while I have to change things personally, I agree that it is important to have a place on the Internet where the law is explained to geeks and tech to lawyers. Also, some have been worried about archiving our research. It will be right here. The only change will be no new articles. I have to get out from under that work load to do other things. But Groklaw will be here, for researchers and lawyers and historians.
I've also seen a couple of articles resurrecting SCO's FUD against Groklaw, so let me direct you to this article, where years ago I responded to their lies about me and Groklaw. Also, you might wish to read our Mission Statement and our
Awards page. They too will help you to identify the truth.
Not that the FUDsters will stop. If they could, they'd have stopped in 2007, when I responded in such detail. But for the rest of you, the facts are laid out there.
Ask yourself, did anything SCO say turn out to be true? Remember Darl's "mountain of evidence"? Extrapolate, and then you will not be misled.
|
