decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
SCO's Cahn Wants Tanner to Audit the 401(k) Plan
Friday, August 13 2010 @ 04:54 PM EDT

It's hard to think about SCO today, but Cahn continues to file. Now he wants Tanner to audit SCO's 401(k) plan. I'd prefer that he audit all the professionals' bills, personally.

Tanner has been expanding its role in increments for years in this bankruptcy. Remember the terms of them auditing SCO's annual report, its 4 quarterly 10Qs, and the required Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 404 audit statements back in 2008?
Management is responsible for identifying and ensuring that the Company complies with laws and regulations applicable to its activities, and for informing us of any known material violations of such laws and controls to prevent and detect fraud, and for informing us about all known or suspected fraud affecting the Company involving (a) management, (b) employees who have significant roles in internal control and (c) others where the fraud could have a material effect on the financial statements. Management is also responsible for informing us of its knowledge of any allegations of fraud or suspected fraud affecting the Company received in communications from employees, former employees, analysts, regulators, short sellers or others.
There are similar disclaimers and limitations of scope in the Exhibit ALetter of Engagement this time.

Here's the filing:

08/13/2010 - 1149 - Motion to Approve the Further Expansion of the Scope of Retention of Tanner LC to Audit the Debtors' 401(k) Plan for the Year Ended December 31, 2009 in Accordance With Erisa Rules and Regulations for the Debtors Nunc Pro Tunc to March 31, 2010 Filed by Edward N. Cahn, Chapter 11 Trustee for The SCO Group, Inc., et al.. Hearing scheduled for 9/24/2010 at 09:30 AM at US Bankruptcy Court, 824 Market St., 6th Fl., Courtroom #3, Wilmington, Delaware. Objections due by 8/31/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Notice # 2 Exhibit A # 3 Proposed Form of Order # 4 Certificate of Service) (Fatell, Bonnie) (Entered: 08/13/2010)

Didn't Tanner already audit the 401(k) in 2008?

  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )