decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Cahn's 3rd Bill, This One for December Only, $112,677.60
Friday, June 18 2010 @ 10:29 PM EDT

Here it is, SCO's Ch. 11 trustee Edward Cahn's third bill for Blank Rome, covering only the month of December of 2009, for $112,677.60, self-described as actual, reasonable and necessary, 80% of the actual bill for $140,847.00. For a single month. Well, you may say, litigation costs. Dearly. Yes, which is a good reason not to pursue pipe dreams. Oh, add on $7,019.45 for expenses. Because, let's be real, bankruptcy court isn't about getting the creditors one flat dime, is it? That's my observation after watching Delaware at work.

Here's the bill and all the ancillaries for you to examine:

06/18/2010 - 1128 - Third Application for Compensation of Blank Rome LLP for the period December 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009 Filed by Blank Rome LLP. Objections due by 7/8/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Notice # 2 Exhibit A # 3 Exhibit B # 4 Certificate of Service) (Fatell, Bonnie) (Entered: 06/18/2010)

I suggest your fine-toothed comb. What I notice is that most of the hours, 159.4 out of 290, were for running the business, such as it is, according to Exhibit A, page 3. If Cahn had opted to shut down the business instead of pursuing the crazy litigation, may I assume that would mean these expenses would not be showing up? If so, it's a crying shame. I warned him not to rely just on what the lawyers told him, but no one listens to little old me. Even though I'm usually proven right. It's very frustrating. Their total billing so far is enough to pay back Novell and the other creditors a nice little chunk, even if it's not the whole amount. And something is better than nothing.

Novell is hoping Emily will wake him up shortly and tell him he was having a bad dream.

Update: I should take a break and let you guys find things. I read the entry on page 6 of Exhibit A for a second as "scam and efile" OPA's bill instead of "scan and efile". Yup. Time for a little break. I'll stop back by in a bit after some ice cream.

But one quick thing. What do you suppose this means on page 12?

Dec 15 09 REVIEW VARIOUS MEMOS AND WEB REPORTS REGARDING SCO ACTIVITY - Fatell - 0.30
I wonder if they'd rather not say the "G" word. That was the time period, though, when Groklaw began publishing, beginning on December 12th, our series "Answering SCO Bit by Bit." The next day, she did the same, review news articles about SCO. I sincerely hope she read it and understood it, even if only after the fact. The next day, you see there was a strategy meeting. And they went on to do the Yarro loan, so after the fact is as good as it can get.

A little less strategy and a little more practical application of lessons learned would be nice.

And I see an engineer quit on December 21. That's on page 14.


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )