decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Agenda for Wednesday's Bankruptcy Hearing: SUSE & Petrofsky
Monday, December 28 2009 @ 01:50 PM EST

The agenda for the hearing on Wednesday in the SCO bankruptcy is now available. It's SUSE's motion to lift the stay that will be argued and the Petrofsky motion to compel, and maybe some uncontested housekeeping issues. So this is one hearing not to miss, if any of you can attend. It begins at 10 AM. Same place. The usual suspects.

Relax. Just kidding.

Please also keep helping with the Comes exhibits project. We've made excellent progress, but I want to finish soon, so I don't start losing my hair. It's only a bearable task if many of you help. And I thank all those who have already helped out. Did you see that one of the law firms that represented the plaintiffs in this litigation just won on appeal, and Microsoft will have to pay their attorneys' fees? $5.6 million. You know, a few million here and a few million there, and after a while you're talking real money. Maybe, I was thinking, as I was reading the exhibits from Comes, maybe it'd be cheaper to just behave in the first place.

Here are all the latest filings:

12/28/2009 - 1008 - Certificate of No Objection Re: Dkt. No. 984 (related document(s) 984 ) Filed by Edward N. Cahn, Chapter 11 Trustee for The SCO Group, Inc., et al.. (Fatell, Bonnie) (Entered: 12/28/2009)

12/28/2009 - 1009 - Certificate of No Objection Re: Dkt. No. 988 (related document(s) 988 ) Filed by Edward N. Cahn, Chapter 11 Trustee for The SCO Group, Inc., et al.. (Fatell, Bonnie) (Entered: 12/28/2009)

12/28/2009 - 1010 - Certificate of No Objection Re: Dkt. No. 983 (related document(s) 983 ) Filed by Edward N. Cahn, Chapter 11 Trustee for The SCO Group, Inc., et al.. (Fatell, Bonnie) (Entered: 12/28/2009)

12/28/2009 - 1011 - Notice of Agenda of Matters Scheduled for Hearing Filed by Edward N. Cahn, Chapter 11 Trustee for The SCO Group, Inc., et al.. Hearing scheduled for 12/30/2009 at 10:00 AM at US Bankruptcy Court, 824 Market St., 6th Fl., Courtroom #3, Wilmington, Delaware. (Fatell, Bonnie) (Entered: 12/28/2009)

There will maybe be argument on some uncontested matters, such as the Chapter 11 Trustee's motion to sell some minor assets without having to cross some i's and dot all the t's you normally have to. And there's the motion to sign a new lease [PDF] with Canopy for smaller digs and another about hiring Hatch Dodge [PDF] as SCO's special litigation counsel.

That's Senator Orrin Hatch's son's law firm.

And SUSE has a motion to file some exhibits under seal.

These were all uncontested, so there may be no need for them to be argued at the hearing. But you know bankruptcy court by now. And the truth is, you never know for sure what will happen until you get there. So do try to be there.

The SUSE motion is the one that deeply matters, of course, although it's all going to be interesting. That's SUSE's motion to lift the stay so the Swiss arbitration can go forward. If you do attend, please pay particular attention to any arguments regarding the GPL.


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )