decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
The SCO v. Novell Summary Judgment Motions: Chart
Monday, March 30 2009 @ 11:51 AM EDT

Erwan has put together for us a chart of all the motions in SCO v. Novell that were decided prior to trial in the August 10, 2007 Order and the final two motions decided after trial in the July 16, 2008 Order. Since SCO is appealing that order, based in part on the idea that some motions should not have been decided on summary judgment and needed to go to trial before a jury, it seems a good time to organize them all, so you can follow the arguments in the appeal, particularly if you are thinking of attending oral argument. Novell will file its response shortly, and oral argument will be on May 6, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom I, Byron White U.S. Courthouse, Denver, CO.

If you are thinking of attending, and you can, here's the scoop: cell phones that take pictures will be confiscated at the entrance. Laptops are allowed. Observers may attend any hearing of interest without prior registration. Map. As with all judicial centers under Colorado law and federal law, the Byron White US Courthouse is a federal government building which means no permitted concealed weapons, photo ID is required for entrance, and you may be subject to electronic search at the entrances. The court recommends that you call the day before or check the website for the "Argument Calendar" and that you are at the door, ready to go in at least 15 minutes before the session you are interested in is scheduled to start.

We aimed at keeping this table as simple as possible. For every last detail, you can visit Groklaw's Novell timeline page. The chart is nevertheless quite elaborate, so if you notice any errors, please let us know.

Groklaw's Timelines allow simple click navigation between related entries, with links to PDFs, plain text versions, and articles mentioning the motion. So the best entry point may be the 10-Aug-2007 order [377] and work around from there, since that is the order that ruled on the motions. Alternatively, you can start from any of the motions: [147], [171], [180], [224], [258], [271], [273], [275] or [277]

Movant Subject Motion Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Opposition Reply Memorandum Hearing Date Decision
Novell Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction [147]
[Text]
[148] [Text] [Exhibits] [183] sealed
[Article]
[209] redacted
[Article]
[205] sealed [198] redacted
[Text]
23-Jan-2007 [227](1) [377] Granted in Part, Denied in Part [Text]
Novell Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief [171]
[Text]
[175] sealed
[172] redacted
[Article] [Text]
[213] sealed(5)
[265] redacted
[Article] [Text]
[237] sealed
[Article]
23-Jan-2007 [227](1)
04-Jun-2007 [356](3)
[377] Granted [Text]
SCO Cross Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims [180]
[Article]
[214] sealed
[Article]
[183] sealed
[Article]
[209] redacted
[Article]
[221] sealed
[Article]
[233] sealed 23-Jan-2007 [227](1) [377] Granted in Part, Denied in Part [Text]
SCO Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Counterclaim [224](5)
[Article]
[213] sealed(5)
[265] redacted
[Article] [Text]
[240] sealed
[242]
[251] sealed
[266] redacted
23-Jan-2007 [227](1)
04-Jun-2007 [356](3)
[377] Denied [Text]
SCO Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's First, Second and Fifth Causes of Action and for Summary Judgment on Novell's First Counterclaim. [258](5)
[Text]
[259](5)
[Text]
[292] [Article] [Text] [346] [Article] 04-Jun-2007 [356](3) [377] Denied [Text]
Novell Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Copyright Ownership Portions of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition [271] [Article] [272] [Article] [299] [Article] [332] [Article] 31-May-2007 [355](2) [377] Granted [Text]
Novell Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition [273] [Article] Corrected [282] [287] sealed
[274] redacted [Article]
[301] [Article] [333] [Article] 31-May-2007 [355](2) [377] Granted in Part, Denied in Part [Text]
Novell Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance [275] [Article] [276] [Text] [306] sealed [Article]
[325] redacted [Article]
[338] sealed [Article]
[337] redacted [Article]
04-Jun-2007 [356](3) [377] Granted [Text]
Novell Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages [277] [Article] [288] sealed
[291] redacted
[Text]
[307] sealed [Article]
[360] redacted [Article]
[339] sealed [Article]
[358] redacted [Article]
31-May-2007 [355](2) [377] Moot [Text]
Novell Motion for Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. [478] [Article] [482] sealed
[479] redacted [Text]
[490] sealed
[501] redacted [Article] [Text]
[500] sealed
[495] redacted [Text]
30-Apr-2008 [532](4 ) [542] Granted in part; denied in part. [Text]
SCO Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Novell's Claims for Money or Claim for Declaratory Relief. [505] sealed [Article] [506] sealed
[507] redacted
[Article] [Text]
[509] [Article] [Text] [525] [Text] 30-Apr-2008 [532](4) [542] Granted, $2,547,817 awarded to Novell. [Text]

(1) 23-Jan-2007 Hearing: See timeline entry [227] [Groklaw's Report from Hearing] [Transcript: PDF, Text]

(2) 31-May-2007 Hearing: See timeline entry [355] [Groklaw's Report from Hearing] [transcript, PDF and Text]

(3) 04-Jun-2007 Hearing: See timeline entry [356] [Groklaw's Report from Hearing] [transcript, PDF and Text]

(4) 30-Apr-2008 Hearing: See timeline entry [532] [Groklaw Court Report, Transcript PDF, Text]

(5) [298] is Novell's objections to [213], [224], [258] and [259]. See timeline entry [298]. [Article] [Text] Exhibit A, Exhibit B


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )