Groklaw - SCO's Redacted Reply Memo in Support of Motion for Reconsideration

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

To read comments to this article, go here

SCO's Redacted Reply Memo in Support of Motion for Reconsideration

Thursday, September 13 2007 @ 02:35 AM EDT

We have SCO's Redacted Reply Memorandum in Further Support of Its Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of the Court's August 10, 2007 Order [PDF], and exhibits. A whole lot of rearguing going on, from what I see in a quick glance. They argue again that Novell isn't entitled to any royalties from UnixWare licenses that also license SVRX incidentally. And there is a change in the room for the trial starting September 17, from Judge Kimball's courtroom to Judge Dee Benson's, Room 246.

They don't say why, but maybe they expect too many people? Or fewer, now that there is no jury, now that I think of it. Anyway, whatever the reason, here's PACER:

460 - Filed & Entered: 09/12/2007
Notice (Other)
Docket Text: NOTICE of Courtroom Change for Trial by Novell, Inc. (Sneddon, Heather)
461 - Filed & Entered: 09/12/2007
Notice of Conventional Filing
Docket Text: NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING of SCOS REPLY MEMORANDUM IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR CLARIFICATION OF THE COURTS AUGUST 10, 2007 ORDER filed by Plaintiff SCO Group re [458] Sealed Document, (Normand, Edward)
462 - Filed & Entered: 09/12/2007
Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages
Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages re SCOS REPLY MEMORANDUM IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR CLARIFICATION OF THE COURTS AUGUST 10, 2007 ORDER filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(Normand, Edward)
463 - Filed & Entered: 09/12/2007
Redacted Document
Docket Text: REDACTION to [461] Notice of Conventional Filing re SCOS REPLY MEMORANDUM IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR CLARIFICATION OF THE COURTS AUGUST 10, 2007 ORDER by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 # (2) Exhibit 2: Filed Under Seal# (3) Exhibit 3 # (4) Exhibit 4)(Normand, Edward)

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )