decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Three Sealed Filings by Novell - Oops. 5 More Unsealed Novell Filings
Tuesday, September 04 2007 @ 06:21 PM EDT

There are three new filings in SCO v. Novell by Novell, two opposition memoranda to SCO's motions in limine 406 and 408 and a sealed Declaration supporting the memoranda, but they are all sealed, so for now, we'll have to be satisfied with the PACER notes.

I don't know about you, but I'm kind of glad not to have anything new to think about today.

: )

The truth is, I haven't had time yet to *read* all the most recent filings that the parties filed on the 31st of August, let alone get all the text versions done. So a breather is nice.

Update: Of course, as soon as I said that, Novell filed five more, along with exhibits, a total of 13 documents. I'll add them to the list.

Here the sealed filings are:

432 - Filed: 08/31/2007
Entered: 09/04/2007
Sealed Document
Docket Text: **SEALED DOCUMENT** filed by Defendant Novell, Inc. - Opposition to SCO's 405 Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Terry L. Musika (note: there is no image attached to this entry). (ce)

433 - Filed: 08/31/2007
Entered: 09/04/2007
Sealed Document
Docket Text: **SEALED DOCUMENT** filed by Defendant Novell, Inc. in Opposition to SCO's 406 and 408 Motions in Limine Regarding Apportionment of Microsoft and Sun SCOSOURCE Licenses (note: no image attached to this entry). (ce)

434 - Filed: 08/31/2007
Entered: 09/04/2007
Sealed Document
Docket Text: **SEALED DOCUMENT** filed by Defendant Novell, Inc. - Declaration of David E. MeLaugh in Support of Novell's Opposition (entry 433) to SCO's Motions in Limine entry numbers 406 and 408 (note: there is no image of this document). (ce)

Eventually, we are likely to get redacted versions. Anyway, there's been lots of good news already today and recently. We can bask in that glow a while.

And here are the new ones from Novell:

435 - Filed & Entered: 09/04/2007
Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion
Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [395] MOTION in Limine No. 3 to Preclude SCO from Introducing New Evidence or Argument of SCOsource Revenue filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Sneddon, Heather)

436 - Filed & Entered: 09/04/2007
Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion
Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [391] MOTION in Limine No. 1 to Preclude SCO from Challenging Questions Already Decided as a Matter of Law filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 # (2) Exhibit 2 # (3) Exhibit 3)(Sneddon, Heather)

437 - Filed & Entered: 09/04/2007
Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion
Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [393] MOTION in Limine No. 2 to Preclude SCO from Contesting Licenses Conveying SVRX Rights are "SVRX Licenses" filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 # (2) Exhibit 2)(Sneddon, Heather)

438 - Filed & Entered: 09/04/2007
Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion
Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [385] MOTION to Strike SCO's Jury Demand filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 # (2) Exhibit 2)(Sneddon, Heather)

439 - Filed & Entered: 09/04/2007
Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion
Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [387] MOTION to Dismiss Voluntarily Its Third Claim for Relief filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Sneddon, Heather)

Number 436 looks interesting. Novell has found a case that Judge Dale Kimball decided in 2003. And the nice thing is the cases this time are without all the copyrighted materials. So I can show them to you.


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )