decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Hearing on Motions in Limine in SCO v. Novell Set for Sept. 13
Monday, August 27 2007 @ 04:50 PM EDT

OMG. There is a hearing on all the motions in limine in SCO v. Novell, including SCO's motion in limine to exclude the very mention of IBM or Groklaw in the trial. All the motions in limine will be heard on September 13. Here is the PACER notation:
400 - Filed & Entered: 08/27/2007
Notice of Hearing on Motion
Docket Text: NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: [389] Plaintiff's MOTION in Limine to Exclude All Evidence Related to Other Litigation and Commentary Thereon, [393] MOTION in Limine No. 2 to Preclude SCO from Contesting Licenses Conveying SVRX Rights are "SVRX Licenses", [390] Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike Exhibits on Novell's Revised Exhibit List Not Previously Disclosed, [395] MOTION in Limine No. 3 to Preclude SCO from Introducing New Evidence or Argument of SCOsource Revenue, [391] MOTION in Limine No. 1 to Preclude SCO from Challenging Questions Already Decided as a Matter of Law : (Notice generated by Kim Jones) Motion Hearing set for 9/13/2007 10:00 AM in Room 220 before Judge Dale A. Kimball. (kmj)

This is really getting exciting, don't you think? I hope somebody is planning to attend, so I can faithfully report all the smears against Groklaw. I know. That may even be SCO's hope. But what can I do? It's my job. I'm a journalist. I have to report faithfully everything that happens. But it certainly feels odd.

Joking around. I doubt much will be said, since SCO claims Novell isn't opposed to not mentioning Groklaw. Like they planned to. Puh lease.


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )