To help us get beyond just the overview, Feldegast has done a chart showing what the decision was on each summary judgment motion and what claim or counterclaim it connects to. I've put urls to the documents in his chart so we can connect the dots. And below the chart, I've made a list of what each claim or counterclaim is about. The chart is in the order that Judge Dale Kimball listed them in his conclusion.

All of the summary judgment motions relate to claims or counterclaims by the parties, so to understand fully, you need to match them up. SCO's Amended Complaint is here. Novell's Counterclaims are here and here are the Amended Counterclaims [PDF] which added two more. You might also find this earlier chart helpful too, a chart of Novell's counterclaims and SCO's replies. If you scroll down to First Claim for Relief, that's the beginning of the Novell counterclaims.

Motion	Docket Number	Claim or Counterclaim Affected		Moving Party	Decision
		SCO	Novell
Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction	147; text		6, 7	Novell	GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART
SCO's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims	180		3,6,7,8,9	SCO	GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART
Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim	171; text		4	Novell	GRANTED
SCO's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim	224		4	SCO	DENIED
SCO's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its First, Second, and Fifth Claims and Novell's First Claim	258; text	1,2,5	1	SCO	DENIED
Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Copyright Ownership of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition	271	2,5		Novell	GRANTED
Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claims in its Second and Fifth Claims	273	2,5		Novell	GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART
Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance	275	1, 3		Novell	GRANTED
Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title for Failure to Establish Special Damages	277	1		Novell	MOOT

SCO's Claims:

• First: Slander of Title
  
• Second: Breach of the APA and TLA
  
• Third: Alternative Breach of Contract Claim Seeking Specific Performance
  
• Fourth: Copyright Infringement
  
• Fifth: Unfair Competition

Novell's Counterclaims:

• First: Slander of Title
  
• Second: Breach of Contract (seeking specific performance of audit)
  
• Third: Breach of Contract (royalties)
  
• Fourth: Declaratory Relief (compelling SCO to recognize Novell's right to prior approval of new licenses and buyouts, such as Microsoft and Sun, and to order SCO to waive breaches/cancel terminations of IBM/Sequent agreements; or in the alternative for declaration that SCO had no right to enter into the Sun and Microsoft SVRX agreements or the SCOsource Linux end user licenses)
  
• Fifth: Declaratory Relief (breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing re SVRX License Program; seeking declaration of Novell's rights to audit, pre-approve, waive)
  
• Sixth: Constructive Trust/Restitution/Unjust Enrichment (seeking restitution of monies due; constructive trust of monies SCO already had in hand)
  
• Seventh: Breach of Fiduciary Duty (re special damages, seeks constructive trust of monies that SCO "unjustly received by failing to perform its administrative auditing and remittance obligations")
  
• Eighth: Conversion (seeking a constructive trust on the SVRX royalties)
  
• Ninth: Accounting