decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
SCO Files Amended Pretrial Disclosure Lists in SCO v Novell
Monday, August 06 2007 @ 08:07 PM EDT

SCO has just filed Amended Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures [PDF] in SCO v. Novell, their witnesses, exhibits, and deposition testimony. It amends what SCO filed last Thursday. I doubt it's the last amendment on either side.

For those who like to compare them, here's last Thursday's SCO filing [PDF]. I'm just starting to do that myself, so we can do it together.

OK. Here's one change: in the list of persons expected to be called or who might be called, in the amended version, SCO has added Greg Jones to the maybe list, with the annotation that they expect to call him live as a witness (as opposed to using deposition testimony) "in 30(b)(6) capacity". Here's FRCP 30. No. I have no idea. They probably think he's related to me. Joke. Joke. Actually, SCO had Joseph LaSala listed for that before.

The only other thing I note is Maureen O'Gara has a different lawyer, Carolyn K. Foley of Davis Wright, whose bio includes this:

Regularly represents magazine publishers and newspapers in assertion of reporterís privilege in response to requests for confidential source information and editorial materials (various jurisdictions, 2006-2007)

While you are at their site, you might like to read some of their articles. For example, here's one on trademarks. The firm is into blogging in a big way, so you can read some of their blogs if you are so inclined. For instance, here's their blog on privacy, Privacy and Security Law Blog. Ding. Ding. Ding. Rats. That set off my irony meter. And here's a ruling she won regarding a Freedom of Information request. Here she is in the Tyco case, where some news organizations successfully argued for access to transcripts regarding the meeting with a juror leading to a mistrial, a mistrial caused by the media, as the judge saw it, when the Wall St. Journal published a juror's name and then she got threatening messages by phone and letter.


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )