decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Court grants IBM's Motion for 30-day extensions
Monday, July 16 2007 @ 08:35 PM EDT

Judge Dale Kimball has granted IBM's motion asking for an extension in the pre-trial schedule, over SCO's opposition. SCO will just have to do the best it can, I reckon, since it filed both lawsuits. Here's the Order [PDF].

************************

SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
Alan L. Sullivan (3152)
Todd M. Shaughnessy (6651)
Amy F. Sorenson (8947)
[address]
[phone]
[fax]

CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
Evan R. Chesler (admitted pro hac vice)
David R. Marriott (7572)
[address]
[phone]
[fax]

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff
International Business Machines Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

THE SCO GROUP, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
MACHINES CORPORATION,

Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff.
ORDER RE EXTENSION OF
DEADLINES


Civil No. 2:03CV-0294 DAK

Honorable Dale A. Kimball

Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells

(1)

Based upon the motion filed by Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM"), and for good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines set forth in the Court's May 29, 2007, order be and hereby are extended as follows:

Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures shall be due on August 13, 2007;

Motions in Limine regarding expert testimony shall be due on August 27, 2007;

Objections and counter-designations to Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures shall be due on September 4, 2007;

All remaining Motions in Limine shall be due on September 10, 2007;

The deadline for exchanging jury instructions shall be September 24, 2007;

The Final Pretrial Order shall be due 45 days before trial;

The Special Attorney Conference and Settlement Conference shall be held 60 days before trial; and

The Court will send to the parties a Trial Order setting further deadlines for the case approximately six weeks prior to trial.

DATED this 16th day of July, 2007.

BY THE COURT

[signature]
Honorable Dale A. Kimball
United States District Court Judge


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )