decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Our Dance Card Is Full - Lots of Filings, in Novell and IBM
Saturday, May 26 2007 @ 12:00 PM EDT

You can't say you have nothing to do over the weekend now. Just buckets of filings, so many I don't even know what they all are. I'll just list them for you and we'll sort out what it all means piece by piece.

Thanks to feldegast, we have them all in the Pacer docket entries, so you can just click on what interests you.

First, in IBM:

1055 Filed & Entered: 05/11/2007
Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion
Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [913] MOTION to Amend/Correct DECEMBER 2005 SUBMISSION (SCO's Sur-Surreply Memorandum) filed by Plaintiff SCO Group, Counter Defendant SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-B)(Normand, Edward)

1056 Filed & Entered: 05/11/2007
Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion
Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [917] Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File OVER LENGTH MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER ON IBM'S MOTION TO CONFINE No correct entry to link to:SCO's Sur-surreply re: Docket Entry 921 - MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re 899 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. filed by Plaintiff SCO Group, Counter Defendant SCO Group. (Normand, Edward)

1057 Filed & Entered: 05/15/2007
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
Docket Text: ORDER granting [1050] Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: Objections to Magistrate Decision; [986] MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION BY THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE ORDER DENYING SCOS MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM IBMS SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE; [1016] MOTION TO DEEM A PROSPECTIVE THIRD-PARTY DEPOSITION IN RELATED LITIGATION TO BE A DEPOSITION TAKEN IN THIS CASE AS WELL. Replies due by 5/25/2007. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 5/14/07. (blk)

1058 Filed & Entered: 05/25/2007
Motion for Extension of Timev Docket Text: Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time of Deadlines filed by Defendant International Business Machines Corporation, Counter Claimant International Business Machines Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(Sorenson, Amy)

1059 Filed & Entered: 05/25/2007
Notice of Conventional Filing
Docket Text: NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING filed by Plaintiff SCO Group, Counter Defendant SCO Group (James, Mark)

1060 Filed & Entered: 05/25/2007
Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages
Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages filed by Plaintiff SCO Group, Counter Defendant SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) 1060 Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(James, Mark)

1061 Filed & Entered: 05/25/2007
Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages
Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages filed by Plaintiff SCO Group, Counter Defendant SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) 1061 Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(James, Mark)

Here's the Novell docket information:

329 Filed & Entered: 05/24/2007
Redacted Document
Docket Text: REDACTION to Exhibit 89 re [308] Sealed Declaration Exhibit 89 to the Declaration of Mark F. James by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Normand, Edward) Modified on 5/25/2007 by adding descriptive text (blk).

331 Proposed Order Filed & Entered: 05/25/2007
Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages
Docket Text: Ex Parte (Not Sealed) MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages (Overlength Reply Memoranda) filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(Sneddon, Heather)

332 Filed & Entered: 05/25/2007
Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion
Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [271] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on the Copyright Ownership Portions of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Klein-Becker v. Home Shopping Network# (2) Exhibit B - Bloom v. Goodyear Tire)(Sneddon, Heather)

333 Filed & Entered: 05/25/2007
Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion
Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [273] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Addendum: Response to SCO's Statement of Facts# (2) Exhibit A-D: Unpublished Decisions# (3) Exhibit E-G: Unpublished Decisions# (4) Exhibit H: Unpublished Decision)(Sneddon, Heather)

334 Filed & Entered: 05/25/2007
Declaration
Docket Text: DECLARATION of James McKenna re [275] MOTION for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance filed by Novell, Inc.. (Sneddon, Heather)

335 Filed & Entered: 05/25/2007
Declaration
Docket Text: DECLARATION of Kenneth W. Brakebill re [275] MOTION for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance, [271] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on the Copyright Ownership Portions of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition, [277] MOTION for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages, [273] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition filed by Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 335-1 # (2) Exhibit 335-2 # (3) Exhibit 335-3 # (4) Exhibit 335-4 # (5) Exhibit 335-5 # (6) Exhibit 335-6 # (7) Exhibit 335-7 # (8) Exhibit 335-8 # (9) Exhibit 335-9 # (10) Exhibit 335-10 # (11) Exhibit 335-11 # (12) Exhibit 335-12 # (13) Exhibit 335-13 # (14) Exhibit 335-14 # (14) Exhibit 335-15)(Sneddon, Heather)

336 Filed & Entered: 05/25/2007
Notice of Conventional Filing
Docket Text: NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING of Reply Memoranda and Declaration filed by Defendant Novell, Inc. (Sneddon, Heather)

337 Filed & Entered: 05/25/2007
Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [275] MOTION for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance [REDACTED] filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Response to SCO's Statement of Facts# (2) Exhibit B - Relational Design v. Brock# (3) Exhibit C - Dick Corp. v. SNC-Lavalin# (4) Exhibit D - Bank of the West v. Resolution Trust# (5) Exhibit E - Wester Online Dictionary Entry for "Require")(Sneddon, Heather)ntry for "Require")(Sneddon, Heather) (Entered: 05/25/2007)

There are some cases filed as exhibits that I'm not including because of copyrights, but I'll try to arrange a workaround. If you can make any of these PDFs text, or HTML, please leave a comment as to which one you are doing, so we don't duplicate effort. Thank you.


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )