decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
SCO Files Opposition Memos to 2 Novell Motions for SJ
Saturday, May 19 2007 @ 12:58 AM EDT

More filings in SCO v. Novell. SCO files memoranda in opposition to two of Novell's motions for summary judgment, Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Copyright Ownership Portions of SCO's 2nd Claim for Breach of Contract and 5th Claim for Unfair Competition (Memo in Support [PDFs]) and Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition (Memo in Support [PDFs]).

So those are the two motions SCO is opposing in the new filings, and here are the docket entries, which we can read together:

05/18/2007 - 299 - Plaintiff's MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 271 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on the Copyright Ownership Portions of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition filed by Counter Defendant SCO Group, Plaintiff SCO Group. (Normand, Edward) (Entered: 05/18/2007)

05/18/2007 - 300 - Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages filed by Counter Defendant SCO Group, Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(Normand, Edward) (Entered: 05/18/2007)

05/18/2007 - 301 - Plaintiff's MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 273 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition filed by Counter Defendant SCO Group, Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Unpublished Cases)(Normand, Edward) (Entered: 05/18/2007)

The eagle-eyed among you will have noticed that the numbering of the PDFs on Novell's second motion are odd. It's because of the glitch I earlier pointed out, that Novell had filed identical motions as numbers 271 and 273, although the memos in support made it clear, along with the docket text, that they were supposed to be two separate motions. So, now Novell has filed the corrected motion for 273, the memo for which was already correct, so it is still 274, while the corrected memo it supports is 282 now. Just explaining so you don't go around in circles. And all of the above need to be OCR and put into HTML, if any of you are willing and able. Thanks if you can.


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )