decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Pacer activity in Novell and IBM
Friday, February 23 2007 @ 02:22 AM EST

There has been some pacer activity Wednesday. One conventional filing in the Novell case (we need to wait for a court clerk to scan them or a volunteer to pick up a copy at the courthouse). In the IBM case we see a request from SCO to get more time to answer why they really really really need to add more disclosures after the deadline for final disclosures; and something that seems like a re-run of IBM-961, but now with addenda available electronicly. Reading the addenda is like SCO was told, not once, not twice, but dozens of times about the deadline for disclosures and what they had to provide by then.

-- MathFox

The Pacer entry for the SCO-Novell case:

239 NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING of Novell's Opposition to SCO's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief; Declaration of Heather M. Sneddon in Support; Novell's Response to SCO's Statement of Facts filed by Defendant Novell, Inc. (Sneddon, Heather) (Entered: 02/21/2007)
Pacer entries for SCO-IBM:
967 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to IBM's Memorandum in Opposition to SCO's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order on IBM's Motion to Confine and SCO's Motion to Amend its December 2005 Submission filed by Plaintiff SCO Group, Counter Defendant SCO Group. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(Normand, Edward) (Entered: 02/21/2007)
968 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 913 MOTION to Amend/Correct DECEMBER 2005 SUBMISSION and re 899 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision (CORRECTED) filed by Defendant International Business Machines Corporation, Counter Claimant International Business Machines Corporation.

Attachments:

  1. Exhibit Addendum A
  2. Exhibit Addendum B
  3. Exhibit Addendum C
  4. Exhibit Addendum D
  5. Exhibit Addendum E
  6. Exhibit Addendum F
  7. Exhibit Addendum G
  8. Exhibit Addendum H
  9. Exhibit Addendum I (under seal)
  10. Exhibit Addendum J (under seal)
  11. Errata Addendum K (Unpublished Opinions)
(Sorenson, Amy) (Entered: 02/21/2007)

  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )