decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
IBM Filings - Redacted Declaration of Todd Shaughnessy
Thursday, October 05 2006 @ 02:24 PM EDT

Here's the latest in SCO v IBM filings from the Pacer docket:
833 - Filed & Entered: 10/02/2006
Modification of Docket
Docket Text: Modification of Docket: Error: Did not attach 2nd half of the document pdf. Correction: Added second half of document. re [832] Redacted Document. (blk, )

834 - Filed & Entered: 10/04/2006
Notice of Conventional Filing
Docket Text: NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING of Declaration of Todd M. Shaughnessy With Unsealed or Redacted Exhibits filed by Defendant International Business Machines Corporation (Sorenson, Amy)

835 - Filed & Entered: 10/04/2006
Redacted Document
Docket Text: REDACTION to [804] Sealed Declaration of Todd M. Shaughnessy by Defendant International Business Machines Corporation. (CLERKS NOTE: The exhibits are too extensive to attach and were submitted on DVD. They will be retained in the clerks office for public access.) (blk, )

We'll need to arrange to obtain the exhibits from the courthouse. They say they have them on DVD, though, so hint to the clerk: that means they are already digital. But we wouldn't need to pick them all up. We have many if not most of them already, as you can see from the list on page 3 of the Declaration. Maybe someone has the time to go over the list and match it up with what we already have? I see a lot of it is under seal, but Linus' declaration isn't. Mmm. I see a declaration by John Terpstra too. And Peter Salus. Say. We do need to get these exhibits, don't you agree? Maybe the court would allow us to make copies of the DVD, minus the sealed materials?


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )