Here's the latest in SCO v IBM filings from the Pacer docket: 833 -
Filed & Entered: 10/02/2006
Modification of Docket
Docket Text: Modification of Docket: Error: Did not attach 2nd half of the document pdf. Correction: Added second half of document. re [832] Redacted Document. (blk, )
834 -
Filed & Entered: 10/04/2006
Notice of Conventional Filing
Docket Text: NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING of Declaration of Todd M. Shaughnessy With Unsealed or Redacted Exhibits filed by Defendant International Business Machines Corporation (Sorenson, Amy)
835 -
Filed & Entered: 10/04/2006
Redacted Document
Docket Text: REDACTION to [804] Sealed Declaration of Todd M. Shaughnessy by Defendant International Business Machines Corporation. (CLERKS NOTE: The exhibits are too extensive to attach and were submitted on DVD. They will be retained in the clerks office for public access.) (blk, ) We'll need to arrange to obtain the exhibits from the courthouse. They say they have them on DVD, though, so hint to the clerk: that means they are already digital. But we wouldn't need to pick them all up. We have many if not most of them already, as you can see from the list on page 3 of the Declaration. Maybe someone has the time to go over the list and match it up with what we already have? I see a lot of it is under seal, but Linus' declaration isn't. Mmm. I see a declaration by John Terpstra too. And Peter Salus. Say. We do need to get these exhibits, don't you agree? Maybe the court would allow us to make copies of the DVD, minus the sealed materials?
|