Rob Cameron and Lawrence Rosen would like to pick your brains. They wrote me to describe their new patent-based
dual-licensing open source business, International Characters. They'd like to know what you think of the idea. They also tell me that International Characters is joining
the Peer to Patent Project and is submitting its
pending patent applications there for peer review. Here's the Peer to Patent press release about it. The opening paragraph explains:
International Characters, Ltd., a private, Canadian software licensing company specializing in the commercialization of high-performance character processing and XML technology using a patent-based, open-source business model, has agreed to become a participant in the Community Patent Review project. International Characters will be the first software licensing company to allow some of its published patent applications to be peer reviewed as part of the community peer review pilot program in partnership with the USPTO.
Peer to Patent Project is one of the "Three Initiatives to Improve the Patent Mess"
that I wrote about on Groklaw earlier this year.
Cameron is professor of computer science and former associate dean
of applied sciences at Simon Fraser University in Canada. Rosen is an
attorney, former general counsel of Open Source Initiative, and Lecturer in
Law at Stanford University. They are founders of the new company,
International Characters, based in Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
I know some of you are already breaking out in hives just thinking about software patents, but I asked them to explain
how they believe their new business model "uses patents to support rather than
hinder the creation of innovative free and open source software, while also
licensing commercial and proprietary applications of the company's
patent-pending technology." So, here is their explanation, and their request for comment.
Rob Cameron, president of International Characters and professor of computer
science at Simon Fraser University in Canada, has invented new technology
that, among other things, dramatically improves performance in processing
character streams, for example doing transcoding and other XML processing.
We're convinced that many companies will want to practice this
patent-pending technology in both software and hardware because of the very
large performance improvement that can be achieved in many important areas
of computing (among other advantages, including significant energy savings).
Dr. Cameron's new methods are examples of the kinds of invention that the
patent system was intended to reward, and we have filed several patent
applications on them. We are also submitting our patent applications to
Community Patent Review because we believe this process will rigorously test
the quality of our patent claims before patents are actually issued.
We founded our company, International Characters, to commercialize these
inventions under a licensing model that supports open source and encourages
more invention by others. Information on the philosophy guiding our model
can be found at Professor Cameron's website,
Our philosophy is related to, but broader than, that of free and open source
software. It seeks to achieve synergy between three systems of technology
1. The academic enterprise, primarily universities and research
institutions, dedicated to the advancement and dissemination of knowledge.
2. The patent system, intended to "promote the progress of science and
useful arts" by securing for inventors a time-limited exclusive right to
3. The free and open source software ecosystem that embodies knowledge
in the form of software source code and makes that source code available for
anyone to use, study, modify and redistribute on free and open source terms.
We have created a new licensing and business model to help accomplish these
broad objectives and to serve as an example for academic and other
researchers seeking to commercialize their patentable work. We will publish
our discoveries in academic papers and through participation in Community
Patent Review, thereby applying the rigorous practices of peer-reviewed
academic research to the dissemination of patentable software knowledge. We
will distribute to the public, under open source licenses, software that
embodies our patented inventions, and we will seek to encourage those who
improve our software to do the same. We will encourage the creation and
distribution by others of free and open source software that embodies our
patents without fear that we will sue them for patent infringement. And at
the same time, we will implement a licensing model that allows inventors and
authors, and the universities and research institutions that sponsor them,
to profit when their patented inventions and copyrighted works are used in
commercial and proprietary products and activities.
The mechanism we use to implement our philosophical and business goals is a
Covenant Not To Assert. Here's the text of the current draft of the
Covenant Not To Assert
International Characters, Inc., on its own behalf and on behalf of its
successors in interest, irrevocably covenants that, subject solely to the
Reciprocity Requirement below, it will not assert or enforce any rights in
any claims in its Canadian, U.S., or foreign patents, including the right to
assert contributory infringement, inducing infringement, or willful
infringement, against anyone because of:
(1) the making, use, sale, offer for sale, importation, licensing or
distribution of open source software; or
(2) the making or use of software or hardware for experimentation,
research or teaching.
This covenant does not apply to the making, use, sale, offer for sale,
importation, licensing or distribution of any software, hardware, or
combination of software and hardware, other than as specified above.
The term "open source software" in this covenant shall mean software
actually distributed to the public under software licenses that have been
expressly approved by Open Source Initiative or the Free Software Foundation
as of the date of this covenant, and that provide that every licensee is
free to make copies of the software or derivative works thereof, to
distribute them without payment of royalties or other consideration, and to
access and use the complete source code of the software.
Reciprocity Requirement: Notwithstanding the commitment above, this
International Characters covenant shall not apply and International
Characters makes no assurance, covenant or commitment not to assert or
enforce any or all of its patent rights against any individual, corporation
or other entity that asserts, threatens or seeks at any time to enforce its
own or another party's Canadian, U.S. or foreign patents or patent rights
against any software distributed by International Characters.
This statement is not an assurance either (i) that any of International
Characters issued patents cover any particular software or hardware or are
enforceable, or (ii) that any particular software or hardware would not
infringe patents or other intellectual property rights of any third party.
No other rights except those expressly stated in this covenant shall be
deemed granted, waived, or received by implication, or estoppel, or
Dated: DRAFT September 10, 2006
Consider the effect of having patented technology that is subject to the
International Characters Covenant embodied somewhere in open source
software. Anyone who receives that software (licensed under any free or open
source license) can do those things with it that its open source license
allows, subject to the normal licensing terms and conditions. They can also
make, use, sell, offer for sale, import, license and distribute that open
source software subject to item 1 in the Covenant. But as made explicit in
the paragraph beginning "This Covenant does not apply...," item 1 applies
only to software, not to combinations of software with hardware, and this
means that there are circumstances when the open source license alone
doesn't suffice. This is one of the ways we give effect to the broader
philosophical goals we described above.
The interesting verb in the list in item 1 is "use." In order to use open
source software, a user must necessarily combine it with hardware. The way
this is reconciled with the exclusion of combinations is to distinguish
between the "use of open source software" and the "making, use, sale,
[etc.], of a combination...." When the product is just open source software
from a software distributor, and the combination with hardware is made by a
user in order to use the software, the combination is allowed. But products
that are a combination of hardware and software are excluded from the
It is this feature of the patent law and our Covenant that allows us to
collect royalties from OEMs who combine patented open source software with
hardware and sell that combination.
As for capturing internal commercial modifications, consider the effect of
the "actually distributed to the public" phrase in our definition of open
source software. A company, just like an individual sitting in his bedroom
somewhere, can be an end-user of open source software, and is authorized by
our Covenant (item 1) to use it. But if that company makes any
modifications, the resulting software must be "actually distributed to the
public" in order to still be "open source software."
Of course, the Covenant also allows "experimentation, research and
teaching." Companies and individuals are free to modify their open source
software in private to develop new applications, but once they put that
patented software into production, they must seek a patent license from us.
This would be true even if the patented software were originally licensed
under the BSD or Apache licenses; those licenses still control for the
copyrights and other intellectual property rights they license, but our
Covenant controls for International Characters' patents.
Meanwhile, the International Characters Covenant also excludes proprietary
software and hardware embodiments of our patents. Those are obvious places
to collect reasonable royalties based upon the value-add of our patented
Our open source partners can implement International Characters' patents not
only for the improvement in performance this new technology brings to their
software, but also to obtain licensing revenue for the commercial uses of
their products in the same ways and at the same time that we do. We welcome
such business partnerships. This is another way the International Characters
Covenant supports open source with patents.
Because ours is a patent Covenant and not a copyright-based software
license, we strike a different kind of bargain with developers,
distributors, and customers than is traditionally done with free and open
source licenses. We make freely available all of our patent claims (even
those you don't yet know about) for open source implementations, and not
simply "necessary claims" for our software at the time we actually
distribute it (contrast our Covenant with GPLv3 § 11 and Apache 2.0 § 3). We
also let everyone embody our patent claims in any software distributed under
any free and open source license, thus not limiting people to creating
derivative works of some original software we created and distributed under
an open source license we selected (contrast this with every copyleft
license approved by FSF or OSI; to address the proliferation of those
incompatible licenses, we created a Covenant that applies to all licenses).
And we require that free and open source software be "actually distributed
to the public," thereby extending copyleft (reciprocity) to include secret
modifications that are not themselves free software; you will notice that
this effect applies under our patent Covenant for any open source software
that embodies our patents, even software distributed under the Apache or BSD
We are in the process of initial consultation with leaders in the open
source community about our legal and business model. We would certainly like
to have community feedback too. We are also preparing technical disclosures
of our underlying patent-pending methods in the form of open source software
and documentation. We intend to coordinate those with the processes of
Community Patent Review.
This Covenant-based business model may not be entirely consistent with the
models of some existing free and open source projects. We already mentioned
the effect on the Apache and BSD licenses above, but there are also
differences with the current GPL. For example, the current GPL does not
require the disclosure of secret internal modifications of free software
that are put to commercial use; the IC Covenant requires public disclosure
of those secret modifications or a separate commercial license from IC. The
language of § 11 of draft 2 of GPLv3 seems to make GPLv3 compatible with
this aspect of the IC Covenant, but this may simply be an inadvertent
consequence of the latest wording of their license. We have already started
discussing this with Richard Stallman and others, but until that license
settles into final form we can't be sure.
We don't believe these differences are incompatibilities. As you know,
patents are in a different legal dimension from copyrights. You may infringe
them inadvertently, and still you may be forced to pay royalties or cease
use altogether. You may suddenly discover patents owned by third parties to
a software licensing transaction, companies that ambiguously announce that
they have (or will someday have) patent claims that can be implemented in
software. On the other hand, International Characters offers to take all our
patents out of the zone of risk altogether for free and open source
software, and we simultaneously implement a business model that generates
revenue from certain commercial uses of our patented technology. This
revenue model will reward other open source companies that elect to
implement our technology, as well as the scientist who made these
inventions, our shareholders, and the university out of which we grew.
We welcome feedback on this new patent-based dual-licensing model. Please
send your questions or suggestions about the business and legal model to
Lawrence Rosen, email@example.com.
If you want to discuss our technology, please address your inquiries to Rob
And of course, posting your comments here on Groklaw is the best way to
share your ideas and suggestions about International Characters and its new
patent-based dual-licensing open source business.