Believe it or not, SCO has already filed its Reply Memorandum in support of its Motion for Leave to Take Certain Prospective Depositions, in response to IBM's Memorandum in Opposition to SCO's Motion for Leave to Take Certain Prospective Depositions. Is that a record for speed? However, I can't let you read it because it's filed under seal. I didn't know you could file things under seal because they are embarrassing. Joke, joke. I have no idea why it's sealed, of course. And because they probably have to tell what went wrong with the crazy subpoenas and say something after Intel's blazing Response, and it might be humiliating for some lowly person in the firm who is probably Boies Schiller's designated law office failure for the purposes of the memo, I'm glad it's sealed for that person's sake. Job hunting is hard enough. Here's the Pacer info on all the latest flurry of activity from IBM, which is now at full sail into its discovery:
624 -
Filed & Entered: 02/15/2006
Certificate of Service -
Docket Text: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by International Business Machines Corporation of IBM's Seventh Set of Interrogatories (Shaughnessy, Todd)
625 -
Filed & Entered: 02/15/2006 -
Certificate of Service -
Docket Text: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by International Business Machines Corporation of IBM's Eleventh Set of Requests for Admission (Shaughnessy, Todd)
627 -
Filed & Entered: 02/15/2006 -
Certificate of Service -
Docket Text: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by International Business Machines Corporation of IBM's Eighth Request for the Production of Documents (Shaughnessy, Todd)
626 -
Filed: 02/14/2006
Entered: 02/15/2006
Sealed Document -
Docket Text: **SEALED DOCUMENT** Reply Memorandum in Support of [607] MOTION for Leave to Take Certain Prospective Depositions filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (blk, )
|
