decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Hearing Feb. 24 on SCO's Motion to Take Certain Prospective Depositions -Updated
Monday, February 13 2006 @ 11:27 AM EST

The hearing on SCO's Motion for Leave to Take Certain Prospective Depositions [PDF; text] is now scheduled for February 24 at 9:30 AM in Room 220. Magistrate Judge Brooke Wells will hear arguments. If any of you can attend, please do, calling the day before or even that morning to make sure there are no changes of scheduling.

This should be rather an exciting hearing, given that Intel has entered the fray with a bang. Here's the Pacer entry:

616 - Filed & Entered: - 02/10/2006
Notice of Hearing on Motion
Docket Text: NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: [607] MOTION for Leave to Take Certain Prospective Depositions, [592] MOTION to Compel Discovery: Motion Hearing set for 2/24/2006 at 09:30 AM in Room 220 before Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells. (jwd, )

Also, if you are planning to attend, please email me so I know we'll have coverage. Thanks. To prepare, so you understand what is happening, you'd probably want to review the motion and Intel's response and the following:

article on Intel's Motion
article on what SCO asked from Oracle
Oracle Motion to Quash in California
Declaration of John Wadsworth

The Oracle motion won't be argued directly in Utah on the 24th (unless it is transferred there in the meantime), but reading it will help you understand the issues, and they are involved, being one of the entities SCO wants to depose. There will be more filings prior to the hearing, from IBM for one, so stay tuned. Remember there is no taping allowed, no cell phones, PDAs etc., so bring paper so you can take notes. Even if you don't understand everything, write down what they say, and others will know what it means. It should really be fun.

Update: The time has change, according to this Pacer entry:

"AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: 607 MOTION for Leave to Take Certain Prospective Depositions, 592 MOTION to Compel Discovery: Motion Hearing previously set for 2/24/2006 at 09:30 AM in Room 220 before Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells has been reset for 2/24/2006 at 2:30 PM in Room 220 before Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells. Please note the change in time from 9:30 AM to 2:30 PM. (jwd, ) (Entered: 02/13/2006)"

So, 2:30 PM. Let's synchronize our watches.

: )


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )